Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research, IISTA-CEAMA, University of Granada, Junta de Andalucía, Granada 18006, Spain; Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDÆA), Department of Geosciences, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.
Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research, IISTA-CEAMA, University of Granada, Junta de Andalucía, Granada 18006, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:613-625. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Biomass burning (BB) is a significant source of atmospheric particles in many parts of the world. Whereas many studies have demonstrated the importance of BB emissions in central and northern Europe, especially in rural areas, its impact in urban air quality of southern European countries has been sparsely investigated. In this study, highly time resolved multi-wavelength absorption coefficients together with levoglucosan (BB tracer) mass concentrations were combined to apportion carbonaceous aerosol sources. The Aethalometer model takes advantage of the different spectral behavior of BB and fossil fuel (FF) combustion aerosols. The model was found to be more sensitive to the assumed value of the aerosol Ångström exponent (AAE) for FF (AAE) than to the AAE for BB (AAE). As result of various sensitivity tests the model was optimized with AAE=1.1 and AAE=2. The Aethalometer model and levoglucosan tracer estimates were in good agreement. The Aethalometer model was further applied to data from three sites in Granada urban area to evaluate the spatial variation of CM and CM (carbonaceous matter from FF or BB origin, respectively) concentrations within the city. The results showed that CM was lower in the city centre while it has an unexpected profound impact on the CM levels measured in the suburbs (about 40%). Analysis of BB tracers with respect to wind speed suggested that BB was dominated by sources outside the city, to the west in a rural area. Distinguishing whether it corresponds to agricultural waste burning or with biomass burning for domestic heating was not possible. This study also shows that although traffic restrictions measures contribute to reduce carbonaceous concentrations, the extent of the reduction is very local. Other sources such as BB, which can contribute to CM as much as traffic emissions, should be targeted to reduce air pollution.
生物质燃烧(BB)是世界许多地区大气颗粒物的重要来源。虽然许多研究已经证明了 BB 排放对中欧和北欧的重要性,尤其是在农村地区,但对南欧国家城市空气质量的影响却鲜有研究。在这项研究中,高时间分辨率的多波长吸收系数与左旋葡聚糖(BB 示踪剂)质量浓度相结合,用于分配碳质气溶胶源。Aethalometer 模型利用了 BB 和化石燃料(FF)燃烧气溶胶的不同光谱行为。研究发现,该模型对 FF(AAE)假定的气溶胶 Ångström 指数(AAE)值比 BB(AAE)的 AAE 值更为敏感。通过各种敏感性测试,模型进行了优化,AAE=1.1 和 AAE=2。Aethalometer 模型和左旋葡聚糖示踪剂的估计值吻合较好。进一步将 Aethalometer 模型应用于格拉纳达市区三个站点的数据,以评估城市内 CM 和 CM(分别来自 FF 或 BB 源的碳质物质)浓度的空间变化。结果表明,市中心的 CM 较低,而郊区的 CM 水平却出人意料地受到深远影响(约 40%)。根据风速分析 BB 示踪剂表明,BB 主要来自城市外部,在西部的农村地区。无法确定它是对应农业废物燃烧还是用于家庭取暖的生物质燃烧。这项研究还表明,尽管交通限制措施有助于降低碳质浓度,但减排的范围非常有限。其他来源,如 BB,对 CM 的贡献与交通排放一样大,也应成为减少空气污染的目标。