Davydova Natalia, Harris Nicole C, Roufail Sally, Paquet-Fifield Sophie, Ishaq Musarat, Streltsov Victor A, Williams Steven P, Karnezis Tara, Stacker Steven A, Achen Marc G
From the Tumour Angiogenesis and Microenvironment Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria 3000.
the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, 30 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, and.
J Biol Chem. 2016 Dec 30;291(53):27265-27278. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.736801. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
VEGF-C and VEGF-D are secreted glycoproteins that induce angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in cancer, thereby promoting tumor growth and spread. They exhibit structural homology and activate VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, receptors on endothelial cells that signal for growth of blood vessels and lymphatics. VEGF-C and VEGF-D were thought to exhibit similar bioactivities, yet recent studies indicated distinct signaling mechanisms (e.g. tumor-derived VEGF-C promoted expression of the prostaglandin biosynthetic enzyme COX-2 in lymphatics, a response thought to facilitate metastasis via the lymphatic vasculature, whereas VEGF-D did not). Here we explore the basis of the distinct bioactivities of VEGF-D using a neutralizing antibody, peptide mapping, and mutagenesis to demonstrate that the N-terminal α-helix of mature VEGF-D (Phe-Arg) is critical for binding VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. Importantly, the N-terminal part of this α-helix, from Phe to Thr, is required for binding VEGFR-3 but not VEGFR-2. Surprisingly, the corresponding part of the α-helix in mature VEGF-C did not influence binding to either VEGFR-2 or VEGFR-3, indicating distinct determinants of receptor binding by these growth factors. A variant of mature VEGF-D harboring a mutation in the N-terminal α-helix, D103A, exhibited enhanced potency for activating VEGFR-3, was able to promote increased COX-2 mRNA levels in lymphatic endothelial cells, and had enhanced capacity to induce lymphatic sprouting in vivo This mutant may be useful for developing protein-based therapeutics to drive lymphangiogenesis in clinical settings, such as lymphedema. Our studies shed light on the VEGF-D structure/function relationship and provide a basis for understanding functional differences compared with VEGF-C.
血管内皮生长因子C(VEGF-C)和血管内皮生长因子D(VEGF-D)是分泌型糖蛋白,可诱导癌症中的血管生成和淋巴管生成,从而促进肿瘤生长和扩散。它们具有结构同源性,并激活血管内皮生长因子受体2(VEGFR-2)和血管内皮生长因子受体3(VEGFR-3),这两种受体存在于内皮细胞上,是血管和淋巴管生长的信号传导受体。VEGF-C和VEGF-D曾被认为具有相似的生物活性,但最近的研究表明它们的信号传导机制不同(例如,肿瘤来源的VEGF-C可促进淋巴管中前列腺素生物合成酶环氧化酶-2(COX-2)的表达,这种反应被认为有助于肿瘤通过淋巴管系统转移,而VEGF-D则不会)。在这里,我们使用中和抗体、肽图谱分析和诱变技术来探究VEGF-D独特生物活性的基础,以证明成熟VEGF-D的N端α螺旋(苯丙氨酸-精氨酸)对于结合VEGFR-2和VEGFR-3至关重要。重要的是,该α螺旋从苯丙氨酸到苏氨酸的N端部分是结合VEGFR-3所必需的,但不是结合VEGFR-2所必需的。令人惊讶的是,成熟VEGF-C中α螺旋的相应部分对VEGFR-2或VEGFR-3的结合均无影响,这表明这些生长因子在受体结合方面存在不同的决定因素。成熟VEGF-D的一种在N端α螺旋中发生突变(D103A)的变体,表现出更强的激活VEGFR-3的能力,能够促进淋巴管内皮细胞中COX-2 mRNA水平升高,并具有更强的体内诱导淋巴管发芽的能力。这种突变体可能有助于开发基于蛋白质的疗法,以在临床环境中(如淋巴水肿)促进淋巴管生成。我们的研究揭示了VEGF-D的结构/功能关系,并为理解与VEGF-C相比的功能差异提供了基础。