Kidess-Sigal Evelyn, Liu Haiyan E, Triboulet Melanie M, Che James, Ramani Vishnu C, Visser Brendan C, Poultsides George A, Longacre Teri A, Marziali Andre, Vysotskaia Valentina, Wiggin Matthew, Heirich Kyra, Hanft Violet, Keilholz Ulrich, Tinhofer Ingeborg, Norton Jeffrey A, Lee Mark, Sollier-Christen Elodie, Jeffrey Stefanie S
Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 20;7(51):85349-85364. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13350.
Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) requires multimodal therapeutic approaches and need for monitoring tumor plasticity. Liquid biopsy biomarkers, including CTCs and ctDNA, hold promise for evaluating treatment response in real-time and guiding therapeutic modifications. From 15 patients with advanced CRC undergoing liver metastasectomy with curative intent, we collected 41 blood samples at different time points before and after surgery for CTC isolation and quantification using label-free Vortex technology. For mutational profiling, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA hotspot mutations were analyzed in CTCs and ctDNA from 23 samples, nine matched liver metastases and three primary tumor samples. Mutational patterns were compared. 80% of patient blood samples were positive for CTCs, using a healthy baseline value as threshold (0.4 CTCs/mL), and 81.4% of captured cells were EpCAM+ CTCs. At least one mutation was detected in 78% of our blood samples. Among 23 matched CTC and ctDNA samples, we found a concordance of 78.2% for KRAS, 73.9% for BRAF and 91.3% for PIK3CA mutations. In several cases, CTCs exhibited a mutation that was not detected in ctDNA, and vice versa. Complementary assessment of both CTCs and ctDNA appears advantageous to assess dynamic tumor profiles.
晚期结直肠癌(CRC)的治疗需要多模式治疗方法,并且需要监测肿瘤可塑性。包括循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)和循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)在内的液体活检生物标志物有望实时评估治疗反应并指导治疗调整。我们从15例接受根治性肝转移切除术的晚期CRC患者中,在手术前后的不同时间点采集了41份血样,使用无标记涡旋技术进行CTCs分离和定量。对于突变分析,在来自23份样本、9份匹配的肝转移灶和3份原发肿瘤样本的CTCs和ctDNA中分析了KRAS、BRAF和PIK3CA热点突变。比较了突变模式。以健康基线值作为阈值(0.4个CTCs/mL),80%的患者血样CTCs呈阳性,捕获细胞中81.4%为上皮细胞黏附分子(EpCAM)阳性CTCs。在78%的血样中检测到至少一种突变。在23份匹配的CTCs和ctDNA样本中,我们发现KRAS突变的一致性为78.2%,BRAF突变的一致性为73.9%,PIK3CA突变的一致性为91.3%。在一些病例中,CTCs显示出ctDNA中未检测到的突变,反之亦然。对CTCs和ctDNA进行互补评估似乎有利于评估动态肿瘤特征。