Collins Sarah M, Thomas Steven A, Heatherly Thomas, MacNeill Keeley L, Leduc Antoine O H C, López-Sepulcre Andrés, Lamphere Bradley A, El-Sabaawi Rana W, Reznick David N, Pringle Catherine M, Flecker Alexander S
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853, USA.
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 13 Natural Resources, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, USA.
Ecology. 2016 Nov;97(11):3154-3166. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1530.
Decades of ecological study have demonstrated the importance of top-down and bottom-up controls on food webs, yet few studies within this context have quantified the magnitude of energy and material fluxes at the whole-ecosystem scale. We examined top-down and bottom-up effects on food web fluxes using a field experiment that manipulated the presence of a consumer, the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata, and the production of basal resources by thinning the riparian forest canopy to increase incident light. To gauge the effects of these reach-scale manipulations on food web fluxes, we used a nitrogen ( N) stable isotope tracer to compare basal resource treatments (thinned canopy vs. control) and consumer treatments (guppy introduction vs. control). The thinned canopy stream had higher primary production than the natural canopy control, leading to increased N fluxes to invertebrates that feed on benthic biofilms (grazers), fine benthic organic matter (collector-gatherers), and organic particles suspended in the water column (filter feeders). Stream reaches with guppies also had higher primary productivity and higher N fluxes to grazers and filter feeders. In contrast, N fluxes to collector-gatherers were reduced in guppy introduction reaches relative to upstream controls. N fluxes to leaf-shredding invertebrates, predatory invertebrates, and the other fish species present (Hart's killifish, Anablepsoides hartii) did not differ across light or guppy treatments, suggesting that effects on detritus-based linkages and upper trophic levels were not as strong. Effect sizes of guppy and canopy treatments on N flux rates were similar for most taxa, though guppy effects were the strongest for filter feeding invertebrates while canopy effects were the strongest for collector-gatherer invertebrates. Combined, these results extend previous knowledge about top-down and bottom-up controls on ecosystems by providing experimental, reach-scale evidence that both pathways can act simultaneously and have equally strong influence on nutrient fluxes from inorganic pools through primary consumers.
数十年的生态学研究已经证明了自上而下和自下而上的控制对食物网的重要性,但在此背景下,很少有研究在整个生态系统尺度上对能量和物质通量的大小进行量化。我们通过一项野外实验研究了自上而下和自下而上对食物网通量的影响,该实验操纵了消费者特立尼达孔雀鱼(Poecilia reticulata)的存在,并通过疏伐河岸林冠层以增加入射光来操纵基础资源的生产。为了评估这些河段尺度的操纵对食物网通量的影响,我们使用氮(N)稳定同位素示踪剂来比较基础资源处理(疏伐冠层与对照)和消费者处理(引入孔雀鱼与对照)。疏伐冠层的溪流比天然冠层对照具有更高的初级生产力,导致流向以底栖生物膜为食的无脊椎动物(食草动物)、细底栖有机物质(收集者 - 采集者)和悬浮在水柱中的有机颗粒(滤食者)的氮通量增加。有孔雀鱼的溪流河段也具有较高的初级生产力,并且流向食草动物和滤食者的氮通量更高。相比之下,相对于上游对照,引入孔雀鱼的河段中流向收集者 - 采集者 的氮通量减少。流向碎叶无脊椎动物、捕食性无脊椎动物和其他现存鱼类物种(哈特鳉,Anablepsoides hartii)的氮通量在光照或孔雀鱼处理之间没有差异,这表明对基于碎屑的联系和较高营养级的影响没有那么强烈。对于大多数分类群而言,孔雀鱼和冠层处理对氮通量率的效应大小相似,尽管孔雀鱼对滤食性无脊椎动物的影响最强,而冠层对收集者 - 采集者无脊椎动物的影响最强。综合起来,这些结果通过提供实验性的、河段尺度的证据,扩展了先前关于生态系统自上而下和自下而上控制的知识,即这两种途径可以同时起作用,并且对从无机库通过初级消费者的养分通量具有同样强烈的影响。