Suppr超能文献

影响社区药剂师主导的药物审查服务提供的因素:来自安大略省药物审查年度服务的证据

Factors affecting the delivery of community pharmacist-led medication reviews: evidence from the MedsCheck annual service in Ontario.

作者信息

Pechlivanoglou Petros, Abrahamyan Lusine, MacKeigan Linda, Consiglio Giulia P, Dolovich Lisa, Li Ping, Cadarette Suzanne M, Rac Valeria E, Shin Jonghyun, Krahn Murray

机构信息

Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay st, Toronto, M5G0A4, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 21;16(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1888-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication reviews have become part of pharmacy practice across developed countries. This study aimed to identify factors affecting the likelihood of eligible Ontario seniors receiving a pharmacy-led medication review called MedsCheck annual (MCA).

METHODS

We designed a cohort study using a random sample of pharmacy claims for MCA-eligible Ontario seniors using linked administrative data from April 2012 to March 2013. Guided by a conceptual framework, we constructed a generalized-estimating-equations model to estimate the effect of patient, pharmacy and community factors on the likelihood of receiving MCA.

RESULTS

Of the 2,878,958 eligible claim-dates, 65,605 included an MCA. Compared to eligible individuals who did not receive an MCA, recipients were more likely to have a prior MCA (OR = 3.03), receive a new medication on the claim-date (OR = 1.78), be hypertensive (OR = 1.18) or have a recent hospitalization (OR = 1.07). MCA recipients had fewer medications (e.g., OR = 0.44 for ≥12 medications versus 0-4 medications), and were less likely to receive an MCA in a rural (OR = 0.74) or high-volume pharmacy (OR = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The most important determinant of receiving an MCA was having had a prior MCA. Overall, MCA recipients were healthier, younger, urban-dwelling, and taking fewer medications than non-recipients. Policies regarding current and future medication review programs may need to evolve to ensure that those at greatest need receive timely and comprehensive medication reviews.

摘要

背景

药物审查已成为发达国家药学实践的一部分。本研究旨在确定影响安大略省符合条件的老年人接受名为年度药物检查(MCA)的由药剂师主导的药物审查可能性的因素。

方法

我们使用2012年4月至2013年3月的关联行政数据,对安大略省符合MCA条件的老年人的药房报销申请进行随机抽样,设计了一项队列研究。在一个概念框架的指导下,我们构建了一个广义估计方程模型,以估计患者、药房和社区因素对接受MCA可能性的影响。

结果

在2,878,958个符合条件的报销日期中,65,605个包含MCA。与未接受MCA的符合条件个体相比,接受者更有可能之前接受过MCA(比值比[OR]=3.03),在报销日期接受新药物治疗(OR=1.78),患有高血压(OR=1.18)或近期住院(OR=1.07)。接受MCA的患者用药较少(例如,≥12种药物与0 - 4种药物相比,OR=0.44),并且在农村地区(OR=0.74)或大容量药房接受MCA的可能性较小(OR=0.65)。

结论

接受MCA的最重要决定因素是之前接受过MCA。总体而言,与未接受者相比,接受MCA的人更健康、更年轻、居住在城市且用药较少。当前和未来药物审查项目的政策可能需要改进,以确保最需要的人能够及时获得全面的药物审查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5edc/5117572/2a35345e676a/12913_2016_1888_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Uptake of the MedsCheck annual medication review service in Ontario community pharmacies between 2007 and 2013.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2016 Sep;149(5):293-302. doi: 10.1177/1715163516662670. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
3
Uptake of Community Pharmacist-Delivered MedsCheck Diabetes Medication Review Service in Ontario between 2010 and 2014.
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Jun;41(3):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Adoption of the Nova Scotia (Canada) Community Pharmacy Medication Management Program, 1-Year Post-Initiation.
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb 1;24(1):e46-e55. doi: 10.22374/17106222.24.1.6.
5
Professional Pharmacy Services and Patient Complexity: An Observational Study.
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;18(5):863-70. doi: 10.18433/j3z60q.
6
Implementation of a reimbursed medication review program: Corporate and pharmacy level strategies.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Sep-Oct;13(5):947-958. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.057. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Descriptive analysis of pharmacy services provided after community pharmacy screening.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1577-1586. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0742-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
8
Implementation of the appointment-based model in community pharmacies: An analysis of refills and adherence.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Sep;19(9):1286-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 28.
9
The appointment-based model in community pharmacies: Patient demographics and reimbursable clinical services uptake in Ontario.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2024 May;157(3):143-152. doi: 10.1177/17151635241241686. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
10
Living MedsCheck: Learning how to deliver MedsCheck in community practice in Ontario.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2013 Jan;146(1):33-8. doi: 10.1177/1715163512472868.

引用本文的文献

2
The Saskatchewan Medication Assessment Program for Patients With Renal Failure: A Qualitative Study to Understand Health Care Provider Perspectives.
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Oct 22;7:2054358120954028. doi: 10.1177/2054358120954028. eCollection 2020.
3
Community pharmacists' evolving role in Canadian primary health care: a vision of harmonization in a patchwork system.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2171. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2171. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
4
Analysis of Real-World Experiences with the Ontario MedsCheck Program.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jul-Aug;72(4):295-300. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
6
Community pharmacists' experiences with the Saskatchewan Medication Assessment Program.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019 Feb 27;152(3):193-203. doi: 10.1177/1715163519827980. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
8
Descriptive analysis of pharmacy services provided after community pharmacy screening.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1577-1586. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0742-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Uptake of the MedsCheck annual medication review service in Ontario community pharmacies between 2007 and 2013.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2016 Sep;149(5):293-302. doi: 10.1177/1715163516662670. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
2
Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 Jul;147(4):209-32. doi: 10.1177/1715163514536678.
4
Eligibility requirements for community pharmacy medication review services in Canada.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 Jan;147(1):20-4. doi: 10.1177/1715163513514006.
5
Factors affecting Medicare Part D beneficiaries' decision to receive comprehensive medication reviews.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Sep-Oct;53(5):482-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12233.
6
Pharmacists' performance of clinical interventions during adherence support medication reviews.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Jan-Feb;10(1):185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 17.
7
Medicines use reviews: a potential resource or lost opportunity for general practice?
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 May 6;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-57.
8
Development of the Canadian Marginalization Index: a new tool for the study of inequality.
Can J Public Health. 2012 Apr 30;103(8 Suppl 2):S12-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03403823.
9
Medication reviews.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):573-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04331.x.
10
Healthy user and related biases in observational studies of preventive interventions: a primer for physicians.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 May;26(5):546-50. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1609-1. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验