Strunden Mike S, Tank Sascha, Kerner Thoralf
Department for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg (Asklepios Medical Centre Harburg), Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 52, 21075, Hamburg, Germany.
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
In the perioperative scenario, adequate fluid and volume therapy is a challenging task. Despite improved knowledge on the physiology of the vascular barrier function and its respective pathophysiologic disturbances during the perioperative process, clear-cut therapeutic principles are difficult to implement. Neglecting the physiologic basis of the vascular barrier and the cardiovascular system, numerous studies proclaiming different approaches to fluid and volume therapy do not provide a rationale, as various surgical and patient risk groups, and different fluid regimens combined with varying hemodynamic measures and variable algorithms led to conflicting results. This review refers to the physiologic basis and answers questions inseparably conjoined to a rational approach to perioperative fluid and volume therapy: Why does fluid get lost from the vasculature perioperatively? Whereto does it get lost? Based on current findings and rationale considerations, which fluid replacement algorithm could be implemented into clinical routine?
在围手术期,充分的液体和容量治疗是一项具有挑战性的任务。尽管人们对围手术期血管屏障功能的生理学及其各自的病理生理紊乱有了更多了解,但明确的治疗原则仍难以实施。由于忽视了血管屏障和心血管系统的生理基础,许多宣称采用不同液体和容量治疗方法的研究都缺乏理论依据,因为各种手术和患者风险组、不同的液体方案与不同的血流动力学措施及可变算法相结合,导致了相互矛盾的结果。本综述探讨了生理基础,并回答了与围手术期液体和容量治疗合理方法密不可分的问题:为什么围手术期液体从血管中流失?流失到哪里?基于当前的研究结果和理论思考,哪种液体替代算法可以应用于临床实践?