Jayawardena Shyamalie, Kellstein David
1 Pfizer Consumer Healthcare, Madison, NJ, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Oct;56(12):1120-1127. doi: 10.1177/0009922816678818. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
Two blinded single-dose studies randomized children 6 months to 11 years old with fever to receive ibuprofen (IBU) pediatric suspension 7.5 mg/kg or acetaminophen (APAP) suspension 10 to 15 mg/kg. The primary efficacy parameter was time-weighted sum of temperature differences (TWSTD) from baseline through 8 hours for each study. Secondary end points included TWSTD from baseline through 6 hours, time to onset and duration of temperature control, and proportion with temperature control. Studies were pooled for post hoc analyses of efficacy and adverse event end points. The primary efficacy parameter significantly favored IBU over APAP in study 1 and the pooled analysis (both P < .001), but was not significant in study 2. Onset of temperature control significantly favored IBU in study 2 ( P = .007). Individual and pooled secondary efficacy outcomes supported significant advantages ( P < .05) of IBU over APAP. IBU pediatric suspension provided greater temperature reduction versus acetaminophen in febrile children, with a comparable safety profile.
两项双盲单剂量研究将6个月至11岁发热儿童随机分组,分别给予布洛芬(IBU)儿科混悬液7.5mg/kg或对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)混悬液10至15mg/kg。每项研究的主要疗效参数是从基线到8小时的温度差时间加权总和(TWSTD)。次要终点包括从基线到6小时的TWSTD、体温控制的起效时间和持续时间以及体温控制的比例。对研究进行汇总,以对疗效和不良事件终点进行事后分析。在研究1和汇总分析中,主要疗效参数显著支持IBU优于APAP(均P < 0.001),但在研究2中不显著。在研究2中,体温控制的起效时间显著支持IBU(P = 0.007)。个体和汇总的次要疗效结果支持IBU相对于APAP具有显著优势(P < 0.05)。与对乙酰氨基酚相比,IBU儿科混悬液在发热儿童中能更大程度地降低体温,且安全性相当。