Tyring Stephen, Solomon James A, Staedtler Gerald, Lott Jason P, Nkulikiyinka Richard, Shakery Kaweh
Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, USA.
Ameriderm Research, Ormond Beach, Florida, USA.
Cutis. 2016 Oct;98(4):269-275.
Patient-reported treatment outcomes are important for evaluating the impact of drug therapies on patient experience. A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study was conducted in 961 participants to assess patient perception of efficacy, utility, and effect on quality of life (QOL) of an azelaic acid (AzA) 15% foam formulation for the treatment of papulopustular rosacea (PPR). Secondary end points included patient-reported global assessment of treatment response, global assessment of tolerability, and opinion on cosmetic acceptability and practicability of product use. Quality of life assessments included the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) and Rosacea Quality of Life Index (RosaQOL). Self-reported global assessment of treatment response favored AzA foam over vehicle foam (P<.001), with 57.2% of the AzA foam group reporting excellent or good improvement versus 44.7% in the vehicle foam group. Tolerability was rated excellent or good in 67.8% of the AzA foam group versus 78.2% of the vehicle foam group. Mean overall DLQI scores at end of treatment (EoT) were improved (P=.018) in favor of the AzA foam group compared with the vehicle foam group. Both treatment groups showed improvements in RosaQOL. Treatment with AzA foam was associated with improved QOL and meaningful reductions in the patient-perceived burden of PPR, which correlates with earlier reported primary end points of this study and supports the inclusion of patient perspectives in studies evaluating the effects of topical dermatologic treatments.
患者报告的治疗结果对于评估药物治疗对患者体验的影响非常重要。一项随机、双盲、赋形剂对照、平行组、多中心3期研究纳入了961名参与者,以评估患者对15%壬二酸(AzA)泡沫制剂治疗丘疹脓疱型玫瑰痤疮(PPR)的疗效、效用及对生活质量(QOL)的影响的认知。次要终点包括患者报告的对治疗反应的整体评估、对耐受性的整体评估以及对产品使用的美容可接受性和实用性的看法。生活质量评估包括皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和玫瑰痤疮生活质量指数(RosaQOL)。自我报告的对治疗反应的整体评估显示,AzA泡沫优于赋形剂泡沫(P<0.001),AzA泡沫组中有57.2%的患者报告有极佳或良好的改善,而赋形剂泡沫组为44.7%。AzA泡沫组中67.8%的患者对耐受性的评级为极佳或良好,而赋形剂泡沫组为78.2%。与赋形剂泡沫组相比,治疗结束时(EoT)AzA泡沫组的平均总体DLQI评分有所改善(P=0.018)。两个治疗组的RosaQOL均有所改善。AzA泡沫治疗与生活质量改善以及患者感知的PPR负担显著减轻相关,这与本研究早期报告的主要终点相关,并支持在评估局部皮肤病治疗效果的研究中纳入患者观点。