Stang Axel, Donati Marcello, Weilert Hauke, Oldhafer Karl Jürgen
Department of Hematology, Oncology, & Palliative Care, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Surgery & Medical-Surgical Specialities, General & Oncologic Surgery Unit, Vittorio-Emanuele University Hospital, University of Catania, Italy.
J Cancer. 2016 Sep 27;7(14):1939-1949. doi: 10.7150/jca.15656. eCollection 2016.
Most patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal liver metastasases (CLM) develop disease recurrence, but little is known about the effect of recurrence patterns and/or systemic therapy on outcome. In this study, we examined the recurrence patterns and survival after systemic therapy plus RFA in patients with unresectable CLM without extrahepatic disease. The aims were to analyze the effect of recurrence patterns on survival and to assess the relative benefit contributed by systemic therapy and local ablation to disease control and patient outcome. From January 2002 to December 2012, 113 patients underwent RFA of liver-limited CLM after systemic therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses for associations between clinical and/or treatment-related variables, recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence patterns, and overall survival (OS) were carried out. Of 113 patients, 105 (92.8%) had disease recurrence (median RFS: 6.1 months). Lower post-recurrence OS was observed after early (≤6 months) than after late recurrence (8.5 versus 24.0 months, p < 0.001). Recurrence sites were RFA-sites only (4.8%), liver-only (57.1%), lung-only (10.5%), or multiple (27.6%); the corresponding post-recurrence OS was 21, 19, 39, and 7 months (p < 0.001), respectively. Response to pre-RFA systemic therapy was the strongest predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 5.28), RFS (HR 3.30), early (odds ratio [OR] 6.34) and multiple-site recurrence (OR 3.83) (p < 0.01), respectively; only responders achieved 5-year OS and RFS (29% and 12% versus 0% and 0% for non-responders, p < 0.001, respectively). Survival after RFA for liver-limited CLM is strongly linked to the timing and pattern of non-local disease recurrence. Local ablation efficacy is necessary but not sufficient to obtain long-term disease control. Effective pre-RFA systemic therapy does favourably affect the incidence, timing and patterns of recurrence and long-term survival and appears essential for the tailoring of RFA application to maximize patient benefit.
大多数接受结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)射频消融(RFA)治疗的患者会出现疾病复发,但对于复发模式和/或全身治疗对预后的影响知之甚少。在本研究中,我们研究了不可切除且无肝外疾病的CLM患者在接受全身治疗加RFA后的复发模式和生存情况。目的是分析复发模式对生存的影响,并评估全身治疗和局部消融对疾病控制和患者预后的相对益处。2002年1月至2012年12月,113例患者在接受全身治疗后接受了肝脏局限性CLM的RFA治疗。对临床和/或治疗相关变量、无复发生存期(RFS)、复发模式和总生存期(OS)之间的关联进行了单因素和多因素分析。113例患者中,105例(92.8%)出现疾病复发(中位RFS:6.1个月)。早期(≤6个月)复发后的OS低于晚期复发(8.5个月对24.0个月,p<0.001)。复发部位仅为RFA部位(4.8%)、仅肝脏(57.1%)、仅肺(10.5%)或多个部位(27.6%);相应的复发后OS分别为21个月、19个月、39个月和7个月(p<0.001)。RFA前全身治疗的反应是OS(风险比[HR]5.28)、RFS(HR 3.30)、早期(优势比[OR]6.34)和多部位复发(OR 3.83)的最强预测因素(p<0.01);只有反应者实现了5年OS和RFS(分别为29%和12%,而非反应者为0%和0%,p<0.001)。肝脏局限性CLM的RFA后生存与非局部疾病复发的时间和模式密切相关。局部消融疗效是获得长期疾病控制所必需的,但并不充分。有效的RFA前全身治疗确实有利于影响复发的发生率、时间和模式以及长期生存,并且对于调整RFA应用以最大化患者获益似乎至关重要。