1 University of Porto, Portugal.
2 Aarhus University, Denmark.
J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(6):738-749. doi: 10.1177/1359105316678669. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
We compared the psychometric properties of COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales, Fertility Problem Inventory, and Fertility Quality of Life Tool in 293 patients enrolled for assisted reproductive technology. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales and Fertility Problem Inventory subscales presented higher internal consistency. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales differentiated best between its domains. Fertility Problem Inventory revealed better concurrent validity. Fertility Quality of Life Tool presented better fit. While discrimination for depression was similar between measures, Fertility Quality of Life Tool was better at discriminating anxiety. Results suggest that while all compared measures are reliable and valid in assessing the psychosocial adjustment to infertility, the choice of measure should be based according to the assessment goals.
我们比较了 COMPI 生育问题压力量表、生育问题量表和生育质量生活工具在 293 名接受辅助生殖技术的患者中的心理测量学特性。COMPI 生育问题压力量表和生育问题量表的分量表表现出较高的内部一致性。COMPI 生育问题压力量表在其各个领域中区分得最好。生育问题量表显示出更好的同时有效性。生育质量生活工具的拟合度更好。虽然各项措施在抑郁方面的区分度相似,但生育质量生活工具在焦虑方面的区分度更好。结果表明,虽然所有比较措施在评估不孕不育的社会心理适应方面都是可靠和有效的,但测量工具的选择应根据评估目标而定。