Mongini P K, Blessinger C, Posnett D N, Rudich S M
Institute of Molecular Immunology, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York 10003.
J Immunol. 1989 Sep 1;143(5):1565-74.
The relative capacity of two coexpressed membrane Ig (mIg) isotypes, mIgM and mIgD, to actively transduce tolerogenic signals was evaluated with three human B cell leukemic clonal populations. Although anti-IgM mAb directed to various domains of the mIgM molecule suppressed spontaneous or T cell factor-induced leukemic DNA synthesis at concentrations as low as 0.01 to 0.1 microgram/ml, anti-IgD antibodies of both monoclonal and polyclonal origin failed to inhibit at doses as high as 100 micrograms/ml. Several possibilities for the differential capacity of mIgM and mIgD molecules to signal inhibition in these leukemic clonal populations were evaluated. Differences in the intrinsic membrane expression of the two isotypes before in vitro clonal activation were not responsible because the above distinctions were noted in cells of a chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which expressed slightly more mIgD than mIgM. The ineffective inhibitory signaling capacity of mIgD-specific ligands was also not caused by a selective decrease in the membrane expression of mIgD during cell culture, because the density of each isotype remained relatively constant during the first 44 h of in vitro activation by T cell factors, and following capping, mIgM and mIgD were resynthesized with similar kinetics. Because anti-IgM and anti-IgD mAb with comparable affinities for their respective membrane molecules differed significantly in inhibitory potential, it was considered improbable that the IgD-specific ligands tested bound to mIgD with a suboptimal affinity for inducing tolerance. Inhibition of leukemic DNA synthesis was observed after incubation with either anti-kappa antibody or a mixture of IgM- and IgD-isotype-specific antibodies, indicating that cross-linking of mIgD does not make B cell clones refractory to tolerogenic signal transduction through mIgM. These studies provide strong clonal support for the concept that coexpressed mIgM and mIgD molecules play distinct roles in human B cell immunoregulation.
利用三个人类B细胞白血病克隆群体,评估了两种共表达的膜免疫球蛋白(mIg)同种型,即mIgM和mIgD,主动转导致耐受性信号的相对能力。尽管针对mIgM分子各个结构域的抗IgM单克隆抗体在低至0.01至0.1微克/毫升的浓度下就能抑制自发的或T细胞因子诱导的白血病DNA合成,但单克隆和多克隆来源的抗IgD抗体在高达100微克/毫升的剂量下都未能产生抑制作用。评估了mIgM和mIgD分子在这些白血病克隆群体中信号抑制能力差异的几种可能性。体外克隆激活前两种同种型的内在膜表达差异并非原因所在,因为在慢性淋巴细胞白血病细胞中也观察到了上述差异,该细胞中mIgD的表达略多于mIgM。mIgD特异性配体无效的抑制信号传导能力也不是由细胞培养过程中mIgD膜表达的选择性降低所致,因为在T细胞因子体外激活的最初44小时内,每种同种型的密度保持相对恒定,并且在帽化后,mIgM和mIgD以相似的动力学重新合成。由于对各自膜分子具有可比亲和力的抗IgM和抗IgD单克隆抗体在抑制潜力上存在显著差异,因此认为所测试的IgD特异性配体以诱导耐受性的次优亲和力与mIgD结合的可能性不大。在用抗κ抗体或IgM和IgD同种型特异性抗体混合物孵育后,观察到白血病DNA合成受到抑制,这表明mIgD的交联不会使B细胞克隆对通过mIgM的致耐受性信号转导产生抗性。这些研究为共表达的mIgM和mIgD分子在人类B细胞免疫调节中发挥不同作用这一概念提供了有力的克隆证据。