Kanemitsu Yoshihiro, Matsumoto Hisako, Osman Nuriamina, Oguma Tsuyoshi, Nagasaki Tadao, Izuhara Yumi, Ito Isao, Tajiri Tomoko, Iwata Toshiyuki, Niimi Akio, Mishima Michiaki
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahra-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya City University, Aichi, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoinkawahra-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Respir Investig. 2016 Nov;54(6):413-418. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is considered an alternative marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation and is sometimes incorporated in the diagnosis of asthma. However, many patients with cough variant asthma (CVA) demonstrate an FeNO in the normal range. Therefore, additional information is needed to confirm the diagnosis of CVA, particularly in patients with low FeNO levels. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of using cough triggers to help diagnose CVA.
We studied 163 patients presenting with prolonged/chronic cough alone (including 104 CVA patients) who underwent FeNO measurements and an airway responsiveness test, and answered a questionnaire listing 18 cough triggers. The sensitivity and specificity of FeNO levels and cough triggers for the diagnosis of CVA were determined.
CVA patients showed higher FeNO levels than non-CVA patients. When the cut-off value of FeNO levels for the diagnosis of CVA was set at 22ppb, its sensitivity was 57%. CVA patients more frequently responded to "cold air" and "talking" as cough triggers than non-CVA patients. When the analysis was confined to those with a low FeNO (<22ppb) group, the sensitivity and positive predictive values of "cold air" and "talking" for the diagnosis of CVA were 36% and 70% for "cold air", and 44% and 74% for "talking", respectively. Their specificity was 81%. "Cold air" was associated with airway hyperresponsiveness in all patients with an emphasis on those with low FeNO levels.
"Cold air" and/or "talking" as cough triggers could be signs for the diagnosis of CVA, particularly when FeNO levels are low.
呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)被认为是嗜酸性气道炎症的替代标志物,有时被纳入哮喘的诊断中。然而,许多咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)患者的FeNO在正常范围内。因此,需要更多信息来确诊CVA,特别是在FeNO水平较低的患者中。我们旨在研究使用咳嗽诱发因素来帮助诊断CVA的可行性。
我们研究了163例仅表现为持续性/慢性咳嗽的患者(包括104例CVA患者),这些患者接受了FeNO测量和气道反应性测试,并回答了一份列出18种咳嗽诱发因素的问卷。确定了FeNO水平和咳嗽诱发因素对CVA诊断的敏感性和特异性。
CVA患者的FeNO水平高于非CVA患者。当将CVA诊断的FeNO水平临界值设定为22ppb时,其敏感性为57%。与非CVA患者相比,CVA患者对“冷空气”和“说话”作为咳嗽诱发因素的反应更频繁。当分析仅限于FeNO水平较低(<22ppb)的组时,“冷空气”和“说话”对CVA诊断的敏感性和阳性预测值分别为:“冷空气”为36%和70%,“说话”为44%和74%。其特异性为81%。“冷空气”与所有患者的气道高反应性相关,尤其是FeNO水平较低的患者。
“冷空气”和/或“说话”作为咳嗽诱发因素可能是CVA诊断的迹象,特别是当FeNO水平较低时。