Bentley-Kumar Karalyn, Jackson Theresa, Holland Danny, LeBlanc Brian, Agrawal Vaidehi, Truitt Michael S
Department of Graduate Medical Education, 1441 N. Beckley Avenue, Dallas, TX 75203, USA.
Department of Graduate Medical Education, 1441 N. Beckley Avenue, Dallas, TX 75203, USA.
Am J Surg. 2016 Dec;212(6):1256-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provides financial incentives to hospitals based on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction survey. This data is made publicly available on their website to be utilized by patients and insurers. Hospitals are profoundly interested in identifying patient populations that negatively contribute to overall patient satisfaction scores. Hospitals consider trauma patients "high risk" from a HCAHPS perspective, but there is no data to inform this opinion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate trauma patient satisfaction scores and their impact on overall patient satisfaction.
Three different analyses were performed. Group 1 was composed of ALL patients admitted to our hospital over a 7-month period who were administered a validated patient satisfaction survey by a 3rd party and compared patient satisfaction of trauma vs. non-trauma patients (ALL). Group 2 compared admitted patients with a specific ICD-9 procedure code to non-trauma patients who underwent a procedure with the same ICD-9 code (ICD). Group 3 examines patient satisfaction between three Level I Trauma Centers within our geographic area (TC). Patient satisfaction data of trauma vs non-trauma patients (ALL), those with a specific ICD-9 procedure code (ICD), and the 3 Level I Trauma Centers in our area (TC) were analyzed with the appropriate statistical test.
In the ALL group, no difference in satisfaction was noted in 18/21 questions for trauma patients when compared to non-trauma patients at our hospital. In the ICD group, 57 ICD-9 procedure codes were analyzed. Of these, only patients who required spinal fusion secondary to trauma reported lower overall patient satisfaction. No meaningful difference was found in HCAHPS associated satisfaction between the Level I Trauma Centers in our area (TC).
In contrast to commonly held opinion, trauma patients do not negatively contribute to overall patient satisfaction in our facility. Certain injuries may offer opportunities for improvement and efforts around improved physician-patient communication may be warranted. In the era of public reporting and financial penalties, surgeons should embrace patient satisfaction as it may be vital to the survival of the trauma center.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)根据医院医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估(HCAHPS)患者满意度调查结果,为医院提供经济激励。这些数据在其网站上公开,供患者和保险公司使用。医院非常希望找出那些对总体患者满意度得分有负面影响的患者群体。从HCAHPS的角度来看,医院认为创伤患者“风险较高”,但尚无数据支持这一观点。本研究的目的是评估创伤患者的满意度得分及其对总体患者满意度的影响。
进行了三种不同的分析。第1组由我院7个月内收治的所有患者组成,这些患者由第三方进行了有效的患者满意度调查,并比较了创伤患者与非创伤患者的满意度(全部)。第2组将具有特定ICD-9手术编码的入院患者与接受相同ICD-9编码手术的非创伤患者进行比较(ICD)。第3组考察了我们所在地理区域内的三个一级创伤中心之间的患者满意度(TC)。采用适当的统计检验方法,分析了创伤患者与非创伤患者(全部)、具有特定ICD-9手术编码的患者(ICD)以及我们所在地区的三个一级创伤中心(TC)的患者满意度数据。
在全部组中,与我院的非创伤患者相比,创伤患者在21个问题中的18个问题上满意度无差异。在ICD组中,分析了57个ICD-9手术编码。其中,只有因创伤需要脊柱融合的患者总体患者满意度较低。在我们所在地区的一级创伤中心(TC)之间,HCAHPS相关满意度未发现有意义的差异。
与普遍看法相反,在我们的机构中,创伤患者对总体患者满意度没有负面影响。某些损伤可能提供改进的机会,围绕改善医患沟通进行努力可能是必要的。在公开报告和经济处罚的时代,外科医生应重视患者满意度,因为这可能对创伤中心的生存至关重要。