Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞:糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的长期预后

Chronic total coronary occlusion treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: long-term outcome in patients with and without diabetes.

作者信息

Sanguineti Francesca, Garot Philippe, O'Connor Stephen, Watanabe Yusuke, Spaziano Marco, Lefèvre Thierry, Hovasse Thomas, Benamer Hakim, Unterseeh Thierry, Chevalier Bernard, Morice Marie-Claude, Louvard Yves

机构信息

Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Hôpital Privé Claude Galien, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Ramsay Générale de Santé, Massy, Quincy, France.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2017 Feb 3;12(15):e1889-e1897. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00278.

Abstract

AIMS

Despite technical advancements, long-term outcomes after chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalisation remain a subject of debate, especially in diabetic patients. The aim of this study, therefore, was to assess the very long-term clinical outcome of diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients in a large cohort from a high-volume CTO PCI centre according to whether or not CTO recanalisation had been successfully achieved.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2012, 1,320 consecutive patients underwent PCI for CTO, 27.4% (362/1320) of whom were diabetics. We compared cardiac death, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI) and combined major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with successful versus failed PCI (median follow-up 4.2 years). The PCI success rate was 75% (990/1,320 patients), with no significant differences between diabetics and non-diabetics (69.8% vs. 75%, respectively, p=0.07). Successful recanalisation was associated with lower cardiac death rates (13.2% vs. 17.2%, respectively, p<0.001) and lower MACE (27.5% vs. 33.7%, respectively, p=0.02). There were no significant differences in TLR (8.9% vs. 14.2% for failed recanalisation, p=0.29) and MI (4.7% vs. 10% for failed recanalisation). Successful recanalisation was a predictor of survival (HR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.32-0.81, p=0.005), whereas diabetes (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.52-3.83, p<0,001), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99, p=0.004) and age (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, per year increment, p<0.0001) were predictors of cardiac death at follow-up. Cardiac mortality rates varied markedly after failed PCI between diabetic (20/103, 24.7%) and non-diabetic patients (15/227, 9.3%, p<0.0001 for comparison between groups), suggesting an interaction between the presence of diabetes and procedural outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

CTO recanalisation was associated with improved long-term survival, a reduced rate of MACE for up to nine years, and suggests a greater reduction in cardiac death among diabetic patients.

摘要

目的

尽管技术不断进步,但慢性完全闭塞病变(CTO)再通后的长期预后仍是一个有争议的话题,尤其是在糖尿病患者中。因此,本研究的目的是在一个高容量CTO经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中心的大型队列中,根据CTO再通是否成功,评估糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的极长期临床预后。

方法与结果

2004年至2012年期间,1320例连续患者接受了CTO的PCI治疗,其中27.4%(362/1320)为糖尿病患者。我们比较了PCI成功与失败患者(中位随访4.2年)的心源性死亡、靶病变血运重建(TLR)、心肌梗死(MI)和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的联合发生率。PCI成功率为75%(990/1320例患者),糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间无显著差异(分别为69.8%和75%,p = 0.07)。成功再通与较低的心源性死亡率(分别为13.2%和17.2%,p < 0.001)和较低的MACE发生率(分别为27.5%和33.7%,p = 0.02)相关。TLR(再通失败组为8.9% vs. 14.2%,p = 0.29)和MI(再通失败组为4.7% vs. 10%)无显著差异。成功再通是生存的预测因素(风险比[HR] 0.5,95%置信区间[CI]:0.32 - 0.81,p = 0.005),而糖尿病(HR 2.44,95% CI:1.52 - 3.83,p < 0.001)、左心室射血分数(HR 0.96,95% CI:0.94 - 0.99,p = 0.004)和年龄(HR 1.06,95% CI:1.03 - 1.08,每年增加,p < 0.0001)是随访时心源性死亡的预测因素。PCI失败后,糖尿病患者(20/103,24.7%)和非糖尿病患者(15/227,9.3%)的心源性死亡率差异显著(两组间比较p < 0.0001),提示糖尿病的存在与手术结果之间存在相互作用。

结论

CTO再通与长期生存率提高、长达九年的MACE发生率降低相关,且提示糖尿病患者的心源性死亡降低幅度更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验