Suppr超能文献

[体外照射加速部分乳腺放疗不同技术的剂量学比较]

[Dosimetric comparison of different techniques for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation].

作者信息

Stelczer Gábor, Major Tibor, Mészáros Norbert, Polgár Csaba, Pesznyák Csilla

机构信息

Sugárterápiás Központ, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.

Nukleáris Technika Tanszék, Budapesti Mûszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Magy Onkol. 2016 Nov 29;60(4):305-311. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate and compare four different radiotherapy techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) considering planning quality, dosimetric and practical aspects. The investigated techniques are three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), "step and shoot" (SS) and "sliding window" (SW) intensity-modulated radiotherapy, intensity-modulated arc therapy (RA). CT scans of 10 patients previously treated with APBI were selected for the study. Surgical clips were placed on the borders of the tumour bed during breast conserving surgery. Target volume (PTV) was defined as enlarged CTV, which was created from the tumour bed through volume expansion using individual margins. Planning objectives were set up according to the international recommendations. Non-coplanar fields were used only for the 3D-CRT plans. For each plan homogeneity, conformity and plan quality indices were calculated from volumetric and dosimetric parameters of target volumes and organs at risk. The total monitor units and feasibility were also investigated. There was no significant difference in the coverage of the target volume by the prescribed dose between the techniques. SW plans were significantly more homogeneous (HI=0.033) than the 3D-CRT (HI=0.057) and the RA (HI=0.073) plans. The homogeneity of the SS technique (HI=0.053) did not differ significantly compared to others. The conformity of the 3D-CRT technique was significantly worse (CN=0.62) than that of SS (CN=0.85), SW (CN=0.85) and RA (CN=0.86) plans. There was a significant difference between RA (29.4%) and 3D-CRT (44.1%) and SW (35.6%) plans in the V50% of the ipsilateral breast. Mean V10% of the ipsilateral lung in 3D-CRT (10.1%) plans was significantly lower than in SS (34.3%), SW (34.3%) and RA (35.3%) plans. 3D-CRT technique provided the best heart protection. The shortest treatment times were achieved with RA technique. Good target volume coverage and tolerable dose to the organs at risk are achievable with all four techniques. Taking into account all the aspects, we recommend the sliding window IMRT technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation.

摘要

本文旨在从计划质量、剂量学和实际操作等方面评估和比较四种不同的加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)放疗技术。所研究的技术包括三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)、“步进式”(SS)和“滑动窗口”(SW)调强放疗、调强弧形放疗(RA)。本研究选取了10例先前接受过APBI治疗患者的CT扫描图像。在保乳手术期间,在肿瘤床边界放置手术夹。靶区体积(PTV)定义为扩大后的临床靶区(CTV),通过使用个体化边界对肿瘤床进行体积扩展来创建。根据国际推荐设置计划目标。非共面野仅用于3D-CRT计划。对于每个计划,根据靶区体积和危及器官的体积及剂量学参数计算均匀性、适形性和计划质量指数。还研究了总监测单位和可行性。各技术之间在规定剂量对靶区体积的覆盖方面无显著差异。SW计划的均匀性(HI = 0.033)显著优于3D-CRT(HI = 0.057)和RA(HI = 0.073)计划。SS技术的均匀性(HI = 0.053)与其他技术相比无显著差异。3D-CRT技术的适形性(CN = 0.62)显著差于SS(CN = 0.85)、SW(CN = 0.85)和RA(CN = 0.86)计划。在同侧乳腺的V50%方面,RA(29.4%)与3D-CRT(44.1%)和SW(35.6%)计划存在显著差异。3D-CRT计划中同侧肺的平均V10%(10.1%)显著低于SS(34.3%)、SW(34.3%)和RA(35.3%)计划。3D-CRT技术对心脏的保护效果最佳。RA技术实现了最短的治疗时间。所有四种技术均可实现良好的靶区体积覆盖和对危及器官的可耐受剂量。综合考虑所有方面,我们推荐滑动窗口调强放疗技术用于加速部分乳腺照射。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验