Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Hepatology. 2017 Mar;65(3):920-928. doi: 10.1002/hep.28932. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive autoimmune liver disease that mainly affects middle-aged women. Obeticholic acid (OCA), which was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for PBC treatment, has demonstrated positive effects on biochemical markers of liver function. Our objective was to evaluate the long-term clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of OCA as a second-line treatment for PBC in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA. We developed a mathematical model to simulate the lifetime course of PBC patients treated with OCA+UDCA versus UDCA alone. Efficacy data were derived from the phase 3 PBC OCA International Study of Efficacy trial, and the natural history of PBC was informed by published clinical studies. Model outcomes were validated using the PBC Global Study. We found that in comparison with UDCA, OCA+UDCA could decrease the 15-year cumulative incidences of decompensated cirrhosis from 12.2% to 4.5%, hepatocellular carcinoma from 9.1% to 4.0%, liver transplants from 4.5% to 1.2%, and liver-related deaths from 16.2% to 5.7% and increase 15-year transplant-free survival from 61.1% to 72.9%. The lifetime cost of PBC treatment would increase from $63,000 to $902,000 (1,330% increment). The discounted quality-adjusted life years with UDCA and OCA+UDCA were 10.74 and 11.78, respectively, and the corresponding costs were $142,300 and $633,900, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $473,400/quality-adjusted life year gained. The results were most sensitive to the cost of OCA.
OCA is a promising new therapy to substantially improve the long-term outcomes of PBC patients, but at its current annual price of $69,350, it is not cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year; pricing below $18,450/year is needed to make OCA cost-effective. (Hepatology 2017;65:920-928).
评价奥贝胆酸(OCA)联合熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)作为 UDCA 应答不足的原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)患者二线治疗药物的长期临床影响和成本效果。
我们开发了一个数学模型,以模拟接受 OCA+UDCA 治疗与单独接受 UDCA 治疗的 PBC 患者的终生病程。疗效数据来自于 III 期 PBC OCA 国际疗效研究,PBC 的自然史则由已发表的临床研究提供。模型结果使用 PBC 全球研究进行验证。
与 UDCA 相比,OCA+UDCA 可使 15 年累积失代偿性肝硬化发生率从 12.2%降至 4.5%、肝细胞癌发生率从 9.1%降至 4.0%、肝移植率从 4.5%降至 1.2%、肝相关死亡率从 16.2%降至 5.7%,并使 15 年无肝移植生存率从 61.1%提高至 72.9%。PBC 治疗的终生成本将从 63000 美元增加到 902000 美元(增加 1330%)。UDCA 和 OCA+UDCA 的贴现质量调整生命年分别为 10.74 和 11.78,相应的成本分别为 142300 美元和 633900 美元,增量成本效果比为 473400 美元/质量调整生命年。结果对 OCA 的成本最为敏感。
OCA 是一种很有前途的新疗法,可以显著改善 PBC 患者的长期预后,但以目前每年 69350 美元的价格,按照 10 万美元/质量调整生命年的意愿支付阈值,它并不具有成本效果;OCA 要具有成本效果,其定价需要低于每年 18450 美元。