Shiraishi Osamu, Yamasaki Makoto, Makino Tomoki, Motoori Masaaki, Miyata Hiroshi, Shinkai Masayuki, Kimura Yutaka, Hirao Motohiro, Fujitani Kazumasa, Tamura Shigeyuki, Kobayashi Kenji, Yano Masahiko, Doki Yuichiro, Yasuda Takushi
Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Oncology. 2017;92(2):101-108. doi: 10.1159/000452765. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) requires reassessment. We have conducted a trial aiming at the comparison between DCF and ACF concerning perioperative adverse events.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either DCF [docetaxel 70 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 700 mg/m2 for 5 days] every 3 weeks or ACF (adriamycin 35 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU 700 mg/m2 for 7 days) every 4 weeks. Each group consisted of 81 patients. Two cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were planned, after which patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy via a right thoracotomy with lymphadenectomy. Chemotherapy- and surgery-related adverse effects were assessed.
Grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 90 and 39% of patients, respectively, in the DCF group compared with 69 and 17% of patients, respectively, in the ACF group (p < 0.01). Perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups. The overall response rates of DCF and ACF were 61 and 40%, respectively, while the histopathological complete responses were 15 and 3%, respectively (p < 0.01).
The DCF and ACF regimens were found to be equally feasible in patients with resectable advanced ESCC; however, DCF delivered an antitumor effect and therefore potentially improved the long-term outcomes.
可切除的晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的新辅助化疗需要重新评估。我们开展了一项试验,旨在比较DCF和ACF方案在围手术期不良事件方面的差异。
患者被随机分配,每3周接受一次DCF方案[多西他赛70mg/m²,顺铂70mg/m²静脉滴注第1天,5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)700mg/m²持续静脉滴注5天],或每4周接受一次ACF方案(阿霉素35mg/m²,顺铂70mg/m²静脉滴注第1天,5-FU 700mg/m²持续静脉滴注7天)。每组81例患者。计划进行两个周期的术前化疗,之后患者通过右胸切口行食管次全切除术并进行淋巴结清扫。评估化疗及手术相关不良反应。
DCF组分别有90%和39%的患者发生3-4级中性粒细胞减少和发热性中性粒细胞减少,而ACF组分别为69%和17%(p<0.01)。两组围手术期并发症无显著差异。DCF和ACF方案的总体缓解率分别为61%和40%,组织病理学完全缓解率分别为15%和3%(p<0.01)。
DCF和ACF方案在可切除的晚期ESCC患者中同样可行;然而,DCF方案具有抗肿瘤作用,因此可能改善长期预后。