Sigua-Rodriguez Eder Alberto, Goulart Douglas Rangel, Santos Zarina Tatia, Alvarez-Pinzon Natalia, Olate Sergio, de Albergaria-Barbosa José Ricardo
*Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas †Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil ‡Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidad de La Frontera §Center for Biomedical Research, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco, Chile.
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jan;28(1):134-138. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003269.
Auricular prostheses are artificial substitutes for facial defects. The retention of these has often been a problem. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical behavior of 3 retained auricular prosthetic connections when submitted to a mechanical cycling test.
Twelve samples with installed implants were obtained and divided into 3 groups according to their retention system with 4 samples in each group. I: bar-clip system; II: magnet system; and III: ball/o-ring system. Each of samples was submitted to the pull-out test during 3240 cycles (f = 0.5 Hz) to determine its tensile strength. The mechanical cycling test was performed using the servo-hydraulic machine MTS 810-Flex Test 40 (Eden Prairie, MN) that had a 2.5 mm shift at a 10 mm/s velocity. The retaining strength for each of the samples was obtained at 7 intervals.
The tensile strength for the group retained by the bar-clip system (29.60 N) was higher with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) when compared with the group retained by the ball/o-ring system (9.41 N) and magnets system (8.61 N) for all periods assessed. The ball/o-ring system showed loss of retention during the fatigue test (Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared = 17.28; P < 0.01).
The evaluated systems showed a tensile strength compatible with the clinical use and no fractures of the components were observed.
耳廓假体是面部缺损的人工替代品。其固定一直是个问题。本研究旨在评估3种固定的耳廓假体连接在进行机械循环测试时的力学行为。
获取12个安装了植入物的样本,并根据其固定系统分为3组,每组4个样本。I:杆夹系统;II:磁体系统;III:球/ O形环系统。每个样本在3240个循环(f = 0.5Hz)期间进行拔出测试,以确定其拉伸强度。使用伺服液压机MTS 810 - Flex Test 40(明尼苏达州伊甸草原)进行机械循环测试,该机器以10mm / s的速度有2.5mm的位移。在7个时间间隔获取每个样本的固定强度。
在所有评估期间,与球/ O形环系统(9.41N)和磁体系统(8.61N)固定的组相比,杆夹系统固定的组的拉伸强度更高(29.60N),具有统计学显著差异(P <0.05)。球/ O形环系统在疲劳测试期间显示固定丧失(Kruskal - Wallis检验,卡方= 17.28;P <0.01)。
所评估的系统显示出与临床使用相容的拉伸强度,且未观察到部件断裂。