Suppr超能文献

作为衡量社会影响依据的政策文件:与政策相关的文件中提及气候变化研究的频率如何?

Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?

作者信息

Bornmann Lutz, Haunschild Robin, Marx Werner

机构信息

Division for Science and Innovation Studies, Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society, Hofgartenstr. 8, 80539 Munich, Germany.

Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Heisenbergstr. 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Scientometrics. 2016;109(3):1477-1495. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

Abstract

In the current UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) and the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), societal impact measurements are inherent parts of the national evaluation systems. In this study, we deal with a relatively new form of societal impact measurements. Recently, Altmetric-a start-up providing publication level metrics-started to make data for publications available which have been mentioned in policy documents. We regard this data source as an interesting possibility to specifically measure the (societal) impact of research. Using a comprehensive dataset with publications on climate change as an example, we study the usefulness of the new data source for impact measurement. Only 1.2 % ( = 2341) out of 191,276 publications on climate change in the dataset have at least one policy mention. We further reveal that papers published in and as well as from the areas "Earth and related environmental sciences" and "Social and economic geography" are especially relevant in the policy context. Given the low coverage of the climate change literature in policy documents, this study can be only a first attempt to study this new source of altmetrics data. Further empirical studies are necessary, because mentions in policy documents are of special interest in the use of altmetrics data for measuring target-oriented the broader impact of research.

摘要

在当前英国的研究卓越框架(REF)和澳大利亚的研究卓越计划(ERA)中,社会影响评估是国家评估体系的固有组成部分。在本研究中,我们探讨一种相对较新的社会影响评估形式。最近,Altmetric(一家提供出版物层面指标的初创公司)开始提供在政策文件中被提及的出版物数据。我们认为这个数据源是专门衡量研究(社会)影响的一个有趣途径。以一个包含气候变化相关出版物的综合数据集为例,我们研究这个新数据源在影响评估方面的实用性。数据集中191,276篇气候变化相关出版物中,只有1.2%(即2341篇)至少有一次被政策提及。我们进一步发现,发表在[具体期刊名称1]和[具体期刊名称2]以及来自“地球及相关环境科学”和“社会与经济地理学”领域的论文在政策背景下尤为相关。鉴于政策文件中气候变化文献的覆盖率较低,本研究只能算是研究这种新的Altmetric数据来源的初步尝试。有必要进行进一步的实证研究,因为政策文件中的提及对于利用Altmetric数据衡量研究的更广泛目标导向影响具有特殊意义。

相似文献

3
How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274693. eCollection 2022.
4
Measuring the social impact of nursing research: An insight into altmetrics.
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1394-1405. doi: 10.1111/jan.13921. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
5
What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors.
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Dec;95:102157. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102157. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics.
Scientometrics. 2020;124(3):2519-2549. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03564-9. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Measuring the impact of pharmacoepidemiologic research using altmetrics: A case study of a CNODES drug-safety article.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):93-102. doi: 10.1002/pds.4401. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of research on health education/health literacy on policymaking in Latin America and the Caribbean Region.
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;11(2):330-348. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024017. eCollection 2024.
2
Scientometrics and academia.
Biomol Biomed. 2024 Mar 11;24(2):207-209. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.10173.
4
A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Oct 31;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00926-y.
5
How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274693. eCollection 2022.
6
Virtual Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Review and Future Research Agenda.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Jul 17;15:1353-1368. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S355895. eCollection 2022.
7
Who tweets climate change papers? investigating publics of research through users' descriptions.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268999. eCollection 2022.
8
A characterization of professional media and its links to research.
Scientometrics. 2019 May;119(2):827-843. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03072-5. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

2
Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 29;11(7):e0160393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160393. eCollection 2016.
3
A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Mar 18;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0003-1.
4
Seven thousand stories capture impact of science.
Nature. 2015 Feb 12;518(7538):150-1. doi: 10.1038/518150a.
6
Assess the real cost of research assessment.
Nature. 2014 Dec 11;516(7530):145. doi: 10.1038/516145a.
7
Impact: Pack a punch.
Nature. 2013 Oct 17;502(7471):397-8. doi: 10.1038/nj7471-397a.
8
Making a difference with research: measuring the impact of mental health research.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Apr;22(2):103-5. doi: 10.1111/inm.12016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验