Paul Shyam S, Dey Avijit, Baro Daoharu, Punia Balbir S
ICAR - Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes, Hisar, 125001, Haryana, India.
J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Aug;97(10):3284-3293. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8177. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
Detailed knowledge of the community structure of methanogens is essential for amelioration of methane emission from livestock species. Several studies have indicated that predominant methanogens of buffalo rumen are different from those in cattle. However, predominant genera of methanogens reported by individual studies varied primarily because of limited scope of sampling, sequencing of limited number of sequences and potential PCR bias in individual studies. In this study, the collective comparative diversity of methanogenic archaea in the rumen of cattle and buffaloes was examined by performing a meta-analysis of all the 16S rRNA (rrn) sequences deposited in GenBank.
Ruminal methanogen sequences of buffalo were clustered into 900 species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and ruminal methanogen sequences of cattle were clustered into 1522 species level OTUs. The number of species-level OTUs shared between cattle and buffaloes was 229 (10.4% of all OTUs), comprising 1746 sequences (27% of the total 6447 sequences). According to taxonomic classification by three different classifiers, Methanobrevibacter was found to be the most predominant genus both in cattle (69-71% of sequences) as well as buffaloes (65.1-68.9% of sequences). Percentage of Methanomicrobium was much higher (P < 0.05) in the case of buffalo (18%) than that of cattle (4.5%). On the other hand, percentages of Methanosphaera- and Methanomassiliicoccus-like methanogens were much higher (P < 0.05) in cattle than in buffaloes.
This study indicated that there is a substantial difference in community structure of ruminal methanogens of cattle and buffaloes. The study has also indicated that the percent of species-level operational taxonomic units shared between cattle and buffalo is very low, and thus host species-specific methane mitigation strategies need to be developed for cattle and buffaloes. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.
深入了解产甲烷菌的群落结构对于减少家畜甲烷排放至关重要。多项研究表明,水牛瘤胃中的主要产甲烷菌与牛不同。然而,个别研究报告的产甲烷菌优势属有所不同,这主要是由于采样范围有限、测序序列数量有限以及个别研究中潜在的聚合酶链式反应(PCR)偏差。在本研究中,通过对GenBank中所有16S核糖体RNA(rrn)序列进行荟萃分析,研究了牛和水牛瘤胃中产甲烷古菌的总体比较多样性。
水牛的瘤胃产甲烷菌序列聚类为900个物种水平的操作分类单元(OTU),牛的瘤胃产甲烷菌序列聚类为1522个物种水平的OTU。牛和水牛之间共享的物种水平OTU数量为229个(占所有OTU的10.4%),包含1746个序列(占6447个总序列的27%)。根据三种不同分类器的分类,发现甲烷短杆菌在牛(占序列的69 - 71%)和水牛(占序列的65.1 - 68.9%)中都是最主要的属。在水牛中,甲烷微菌的百分比(18%)比牛(4.5%)高得多(P < 0.05)。另一方面,牛中类甲烷球形菌和类甲烷鬃球菌产甲烷菌的百分比比水牛高得多(P < 0.05)。
本研究表明,牛和水牛瘤胃中产甲烷菌的群落结构存在显著差异。该研究还表明,牛和水牛之间共享的物种水平操作分类单元百分比非常低,因此需要为牛和水牛制定宿主物种特异性的甲烷减排策略。© 2016化学工业协会