• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由一位外科医生进行的腹腔镜胆胰转流十二指肠转位术与袖状胃切除术的配对队列研究。

A matched cohort study of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and sleeve gastrectomy performed by one surgeon.

作者信息

Polega James R, Barreto Tyler W, Kemmeter Kimberly D, Koehler Tracy J, Davis Alan T, Kemmeter Paul R

机构信息

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan.

Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners /Michigan State University Family Medicine Residency, East Lansing, Michigan.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Mar;13(3):411-414. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.023
PMID:27986583
Abstract

SETTING

Spectrum Blodgett and Mercy Health St. Mary's hospitals in Grand Rapids, Michigan OBJECTIVE: To compare the 30-day outcomes of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic BPD/DS has been shown to be superior to SG in terms of excess weight loss. Despite this superiority, BPD/DS accounts for a small percentage of all metabolic surgeries due partly to the perception that BPD/DS has a higher complication rate than SG.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients who underwent BPD/DS or SG from January 2008 to August 2014 by 1 surgeon was completed. These patients were used to construct cohorts matched via propensity score matching and compared by surgical type. Data collected included patient demographic characteristics; hospital length of stay (LOS); and 30-day rates of leak, bleed, reoperation, readmission, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 741 patients who underwent BPD/DS or SG, 2 cohorts of 167 patients each were matched for age, sex, and BMI. LOS was longer in the BPD/DS cohort (2.5±.9 days versus 2.1±.7 days, P<.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in relation to 30-day postoperative rates of leak (.3% versus .6%, P>.99), bleed (0% versus .3%, P>.99), reoperation (1.2% versus .6%, P>.99), or readmission (3% versus 1.2%, P = .45). There were no mortalities.

CONCLUSION

After matching for age, sex, and BMI, BPD/DS found no significant differences from SG with regard to 30-day postoperative rates of leak, bleed, reoperation, readmission, or mortality.

摘要

研究背景

密歇根州大急流城的斯pectrum Blodgett医院和梅西健康圣玛丽医院

目的

比较腹腔镜胆胰分流十二指肠转位术(BPD/DS)与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SG)的30天治疗效果。

背景

腹腔镜BPD/DS在减重方面已被证明优于SG。尽管有这种优势,但BPD/DS在所有代谢手术中所占比例较小,部分原因是人们认为BPD/DS的并发症发生率高于SG。

方法

对2008年1月至2014年8月间由1名外科医生实施BPD/DS或SG手术的所有患者进行回顾性研究。这些患者用于构建通过倾向得分匹配的队列,并按手术类型进行比较。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学特征、住院时间(LOS)以及30天的渗漏、出血、再次手术、再入院和死亡率。

结果

在接受BPD/DS或SG手术的741例患者中,每组167例患者按年龄、性别和BMI进行匹配。BPD/DS队列的住院时间更长(2.5±0.9天对2.1±0.7天,P<0.001)。两组在术后30天的渗漏率(0.3%对0.6%,P>0.99)、出血率(0%对0.3%,P>0.99)、再次手术率(1.2%对0.6%,P>0.99)或再入院率(3%对1.2%,P = 0.45)方面无显著差异。无死亡病例。

结论

在按年龄、性别和BMI匹配后,BPD/DS与SG在术后30天的渗漏、出血、再次手术、再入院或死亡率方面无显著差异。

相似文献

1
A matched cohort study of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and sleeve gastrectomy performed by one surgeon.由一位外科医生进行的腹腔镜胆胰转流十二指肠转位术与袖状胃切除术的配对队列研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Mar;13(3):411-414. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
2
Comparative early outcomes of three laparoscopic bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.三种腹腔镜减重手术的早期对比结果:胃袖状切除术、胃旁路术和胆胰分流十二指肠转位术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
3
Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm.因减重失败将腹腔镜袖状胃切除术转换为十二指肠转位的胆胰分流术或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:我们的算法
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Second-stage duodenal switch for sleeve gastrectomy failure: A matched controlled trial.袖状胃切除术后失败行二期十二指肠转位术:一项配对对照试验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1570-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up.在单一机构对胆胰转流十二指肠转位术与单吻合口十二指肠转位术(SIPS-保留胃十二指肠幽门手术)进行回顾性比较,并进行两年随访。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Mar;13(3):415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
6
Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.袖状胃切除术后的二次手术:Roux-en-Y胃旁路术或胆胰转流十二指肠转位术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):771-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
7
Is laparoscopic single-stage biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch safe in super morbidly obese patients?对于超级肥胖患者,腹腔镜单阶段胆胰转流并十二指肠转位术是否安全?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
8
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case-control study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合十二指肠转位术与单阶段十二指肠转位术治疗超级肥胖症的对比:病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Jul-Aug;9(4):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
9
Laparoscopic reoperative sleeve gastrectomy for poor weight loss after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.腹腔镜再次手术袖状胃切除术治疗胆胰转流十二指肠转位术后体重减轻不佳
Obes Surg. 2003 Aug;13(4):649-54. doi: 10.1381/096089203322190907.
10
Venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: analysis of 362 patients.腹腔镜胆胰转流十二指肠转位术后的静脉血栓栓塞:362例患者分析
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) on bariatric surgery: update 2020 endorsed by IFSO-EC, EASO and ESPCOP.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于减重手术的临床实践指南:2020 年更新版,获得国际肥胖与代谢外科学会联合会(IFSO-EC)、欧洲肥胖与代谢外科学会(EASO)和欧洲减重外科学会(ESPCOP)认可。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2332-2358. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07555-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.