Sánchez Eladio, Corrales Jose-Antonio, Fantidis Pasnayotis, Tarhini Ibrahim S, Khan Ijaz, Pineda Tomás, González Jose-Ramon
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain.
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Jan;25(1):75-81.
Sutureless aortic bioprosthetic valves have become an alternative to conventional bioprostheses in high surgical risk cases. A significant decline in platelet count during the immediate postoperative period was observed in cases of Perceval S sutureless aortic valve implantation. The study aim was to determine how the reduction in platelet count after Perceval S prosthesis implantation compared to that after other bioprosthesis implants. METHODS: Between July 2011 and July 2014, a total of 77 isolated biological aortic valve replacements (AVRs) was performed at the authors’ institution. These included 27 Perceval S prostheses (35.1%) and 50 Mitroflow prostheses (64.9%). Platelet counts and mean platelet volumes (MPVs) were determined on the day before surgery (T0) and at 24 h (T1), 48 h (T2) and 72 h (T3) after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in inhospital mortality (three Perceval S (11.1%) versus four Mitroflow 8%); p = 0.65), nor in morbidity between groups. A total of 16 patients (20.8%) had severe postoperative thrombocytopenia (<50×103/mm3). The incidence of severe thrombocytopenia was significantly higher (p = 0.046) in Perceval S patients (n = 9; 33.3%) than in Mitroflow patients (n = 7; 14%). The platelet count recovered in all patients with severe thrombocytopenia. In an adjusted-propensity multivariate logistic regression analysis, the Perceval S prosthesis was the major independent predictor of severe thrombocytopenia after AVR (OR 0.06, 95% CI: 0008-0.5, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Aortic bioprosthesis implantation with the Perceval S sutureless bioprosthesis appears to be associated with the occurrence of postoperative thrombocytopenia, though without any clinical implication for the patients. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm these data.
在高手术风险病例中,无缝合主动脉生物瓣膜已成为传统生物瓣膜的替代选择。在Perceval S无缝合主动脉瓣膜植入病例中,术后即刻血小板计数显著下降。本研究旨在确定与其他生物瓣膜植入后相比,Perceval S假体植入后血小板计数的降低情况。方法:2011年7月至2014年7月期间,作者所在机构共进行了77例单纯生物主动脉瓣膜置换术(AVR)。其中包括27例Perceval S假体(35.1%)和50例Mitroflow假体(64.9%)。在手术前一天(T0)以及术后24小时(T1)、48小时(T2)和72小时(T3)测定血小板计数和平均血小板体积(MPV)。结果:两组患者的住院死亡率(3例Perceval S患者(11.1%)对4例Mitroflow患者(8%);p = 0.65)以及发病率均无显著差异。共有16例患者(20.8%)术后出现严重血小板减少症(<50×10³/mm³)。Perceval S患者(n = 9;33.3%)严重血小板减少症的发生率显著高于Mitroflow患者(n = 7;14%)(p = 0.046)。所有严重血小板减少症患者的血小板计数均恢复。在调整倾向多因素逻辑回归分析中,Perceval S假体是AVR术后严重血小板减少症的主要独立预测因素(OR 0.06,95% CI:0.008 - 0.5,p = 0.009)。结论:使用Perceval S无缝合生物瓣膜进行主动脉生物瓣膜植入似乎与术后血小板减少症的发生有关,尽管对患者没有任何临床影响。需要进行前瞻性随机试验来证实这些数据。