Haws M Edward, Linscott Luke, Thomas Cameron, Orscheln Emily, Radhakrishnan Rupa, Kline-Fath Beth
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;182:283-289.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
To assess whether computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neurosurgical evaluations altered the diagnosis or management of children diagnosed with benign macrocrania of infancy by ultrasonography (US).
We queried our radiology database to identify patients diagnosed with benign macrocrania of infancy by US between 2006 and 2013. Medical records of those with follow-up CT/MRI were reviewed to determine clinical/neurologic status and whether or not CT/MRI imaging resulted in diagnosis of communicating hydrocephalus or required neurosurgical intervention.
Patients with benign macrocrania of infancy (n = 466) were identified (mean age at diagnosis: 6.5 months). Eighty-four patients (18.0%) received subsequent head CT/MRI; of these, 10 patients had neurologic abnormalities before 2 years of age, of which 3 had significant findings on MRI (temporal lobe white matter changes, dysmorphic ventricles, thinned corpus callosum). One patient without neurologic abnormalities had nonspecific white matter signal abnormality (stable over 6 months) but no change in management. None required neurosurgical intervention. Another 9/84 patients had incidental findings including Chiari I (3), small subdural bleeds (2), arachnoid cyst (1), small cavernous malformation (1), frontal bone dermoid (1), and a linear parietal bone fracture after a fall (1).
Children diagnosed with benign macrocrania of infancy on US without focal neurologic findings do not require subsequent brain CT/MRI or neurosurgical evaluation. Decreasing unnecessary imaging would decrease costs, minimize radiation and sedation exposures, and increase clinic availability of neurology and neurosurgery specialists.
评估计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和神经外科评估是否改变了通过超声检查(US)诊断为婴儿期良性巨颅症患儿的诊断或治疗方案。
我们查询了放射学数据库,以确定2006年至2013年间通过超声诊断为婴儿期良性巨颅症的患者。对那些接受了后续CT/MRI检查的患者的病历进行了审查,以确定临床/神经学状况,以及CT/MRI成像是否导致交通性脑积水的诊断或是否需要神经外科干预。
确定了婴儿期良性巨颅症患者(n = 466)(诊断时的平均年龄:6.5个月)。84名患者(18.0%)接受了后续头部CT/MRI检查;其中,10名患者在2岁前有神经学异常,其中3名在MRI上有显著发现(颞叶白质改变、脑室畸形、胼胝体变薄)。1名无神经学异常的患者有非特异性白质信号异常(6个月内稳定),但治疗方案无变化。无人需要神经外科干预。另外9/84名患者有偶然发现,包括Chiari I畸形(3例)、小的硬膜下出血(2例)、蛛网膜囊肿(1例)、小的海绵状畸形(1例)、额骨皮样囊肿(1例)和跌倒后顶骨线性骨折(1例)。
通过超声诊断为婴儿期良性巨颅症且无局灶性神经学表现的儿童不需要后续的脑部CT/MRI或神经外科评估。减少不必要的影像学检查将降低成本,使辐射和镇静暴露最小化,并增加神经科和神经外科专家的门诊可及性。