Kupec Tomas, Pecks Ulrich, Gräf Charlotte M, Stickeler Elmar, Meinhold-Heerlein Ivo, Najjari Laila
Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany; Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1810352. doi: 10.1155/2016/1810352. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
The objective was to evaluate the usefulness of transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of the urethral length and urethral lumen by 3D/4D transperineal sonography to discriminate between female patients with subtypes of urinary incontinence. A total of 150 female patients underwent an examination because of urinary incontinence. 41 patients were diagnosed with urgency urinary incontinence (OAB), 67 patients were diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and 42 patients were in the control group (CTRL). Three diameters of the urethral lumen (proximal (U1), medial (U2), and distal (U3)) and the urethral length were measured. By the assessment of the urethral lumen, the presence of the urethral funneling was evaluated. We found a significant difference in the urethral length and urethral lumen U2 of OAB and SUI versus CTRL. The urethral length was significantly greater ( < 0.05) and the urethral lumen was significantly wider ( < 0.05) in the patients with urinary incontinence. The incidence of the urethral funneling was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in the study groups with urinary incontinence than in the control group. Our results have shown the urethral changes obtained by ultrasound in patients with urinary incontinence, but they are still insufficient to distinguish between subtypes of urinary incontinence.
目的是通过三维/四维经会阴超声评估经会阴超声在评估尿道长度和尿道管腔方面的实用性,以区分不同亚型尿失禁的女性患者。共有150例因尿失禁接受检查的女性患者。41例被诊断为急迫性尿失禁(OAB),67例被诊断为压力性尿失禁(SUI),42例为对照组(CTRL)。测量尿道管腔的三个直径(近端(U1)、中间(U2)和远端(U3))以及尿道长度。通过评估尿道管腔,评估尿道漏斗的存在情况。我们发现,与对照组相比,OAB和SUI患者的尿道长度和尿道管腔U2存在显著差异。尿失禁患者的尿道长度显著更长(<0.05),尿道管腔显著更宽(<0.05)。尿失禁研究组中尿道漏斗的发生率显著高于对照组(<0.05)。我们的结果显示了超声检查在尿失禁患者中获得的尿道变化,但仍不足以区分尿失禁的亚型。