Lee Sanghoo, Kim Joo-Hoon, Kim Seol-A, Sun Yeoun-Soo, Lee Anna, Park Seo-Jin, Kim Yun-Tae, Lee Kyoung-Ryul, Kim Young-Jin
Department of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Yongin, Korea.
Companion Biomarker Center, SCL Healthcare Inc., Yongin, Korea.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2016 Dec;46(6):645-653.
Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) is well-known to be a reliable biomarker of human vitamin D status, with the recognition of widespread vitamin D insufficiency in general populations. The aims of this study are to validate a fast and simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantifying 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D in serum and to compare two automated immunoassays with the LC-MS/MS method.
Samples were prepared by protein precipitation with ethanol including 25(OH)D-d, followed by a liquid-liquid extraction with hexane. The analytes were separated within a total run time of 3 min. Accuracy was evaluated with standard reference materials (SRM) 972a. Using 150 samples, the LC-MS/MS method was compared with the LIAISON assay and ADVIA Centaur assay.
The LC-MS/MS method had a limit of quantitation of 1 ng/mL for the 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D with linear responses between 1 and 100 ng/mL. Intra- and inter-assay precision were <8.8% and <13.2%, respectively. It also showed a smallest mean difference (+0.9%) for the SRM level 1 to 3, compared to the two immunoassays. Compared to the LC-MS/MS, the mean biases of the RIAISON and ADVIA were +2.4 and +7.9 ng/mL, respectively. Also, the agreement of the LC-MS/MS with the RIAISON was better than that with the ADVIA.
This study suggests that the LC-MS/MS method traceable to the SRM can be reliably applied in routine quantification of 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D.
众所周知,总25-羟基维生素D(25(OH)D)是人体维生素D状态的可靠生物标志物,且已认识到普通人群中普遍存在维生素D不足的情况。本研究的目的是验证一种快速简便的液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)用于定量血清中的25(OH)D和25(OH)D,并将两种自动化免疫测定法与LC-MS/MS法进行比较。
样品采用乙醇蛋白沉淀法制备,其中包括25(OH)D-d,随后用己烷进行液-液萃取。分析物在3分钟的总运行时间内分离。使用标准参考物质(SRM)972a评估准确性。使用150个样品,将LC-MS/MS法与LIAISON测定法和ADVIA Centaur测定法进行比较。
LC-MS/MS法对25(OH)D和25(OH)D的定量限为1 ng/mL,在1至100 ng/mL之间呈线性响应。批内和批间精密度分别<8.8%和<13.2%。与两种免疫测定法相比,其在SRM 1至3水平上的平均差异最小(+0.9%)。与LC-MS/MS相比,LIAISON和ADVIA的平均偏差分别为+2.4和+7.9 ng/mL。此外,LC-MS/MS与LIAISON的一致性优于与ADVIA的一致性。
本研究表明,可溯源至SRM的LC-MS/MS法可可靠地应用于25(OH)D和25(OH)D的常规定量分析。