Vianna Jacqueline Rodrigues de Freitas, Pires Di Lorenzo Valéria Amorim, Simões Miléa Mara Lourenço da Silva, Jamami Maurício
Claretiano Centro Universitário, Santa Casa of Misericórdia Hospital, Batatais, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Respir Care. 2017 Jan;62(1):92-101. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04665. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
Endotracheal suctioning is required for mechanically ventilated patients to maintain a patent airway. Studies show that open endotracheal suctioning affects respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of hyperoxygenation with F + 0.20 above baseline and hyperoxygenation with F 1.0 in preventing hypoxemia, and to determine the impact of open endotracheal suctioning on the pulmonary ventilation of critical subjects receiving mechanical ventilatory support.
This prospective randomized crossover study was conducted in the ICU. Sixty-eight mechanically ventilated subjects with F ≤ 0.6 and requiring endotracheal suctioning were included in this study. Open endotracheal suctioning was performed using 2 different intervention sequences: hyperoxygenation of 0.20 above baseline F (F + 0.20) and 1.0 hyperoxygenation (F 1.0). Oxygenation was assessed via oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (S ), and changes in lung ventilation were measured via alveolar gas volume (V̇), alveolar minute volume (V̇), carbon dioxide (CO) production (V̇ ), mixed exhaled partial pressure of CO (P ), exhaled tidal CO volume (VCO), end-tidal CO (P ), anatomical dead space to tidal volume ratio (V/V), and anatomical dead space volume of each breath (V) using volumetric capnography, and breathing frequency (f), heart rate, and mean arterial pressure using a multiparameter monitor.
S levels were significantly higher within interventions (F + 0.20 and 1.0) 1 min before and after suction. Also, there was a significant increase in P , P , heart rate, and mean arterial pressure immediately after the procedure compared with baseline, and in VCO, only for F + 0.20. Baseline values were not found to be significantly different between the groups in case of any dependent variable.
In mechanically ventilated adult subjects, hyperoxygenation with F + 0.20 above baseline prevents hypoxemia. Also, transient changes in pulmonary ventilation with open circuit suctioning were confirmed by volumetric capnography analysis. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02440919).
机械通气患者需要进行气管内吸痰以维持气道通畅。研究表明,开放式气管内吸痰会影响呼吸力学和气体交换。本研究的目的是比较基线以上F + 0.20的高氧合与F 1.0的高氧合在预防低氧血症方面的有效性,并确定开放式气管内吸痰对接受机械通气支持的危重症患者肺通气的影响。
这项前瞻性随机交叉研究在重症监护病房进行。本研究纳入了68名F≤0.6且需要气管内吸痰的机械通气患者。采用两种不同的干预顺序进行开放式气管内吸痰:基线F值以上0.20的高氧合(F + 0.20)和1.0的高氧合(F 1.0)。通过脉搏血氧饱和度仪测量的血氧饱和度(S)评估氧合情况,并使用容量式二氧化碳描记法通过肺泡气体量(V̇)、肺泡分钟通气量(V̇)、二氧化碳(CO)产生量(V̇ )、呼出混合二氧化碳分压(P )、呼出潮气二氧化碳量(VCO)、呼气末二氧化碳分压(P )、解剖死腔与潮气量比值(V/V)以及每次呼吸的解剖死腔量(V)测量肺通气的变化,并使用多参数监护仪测量呼吸频率(f)、心率和平均动脉压。
在吸痰前1分钟和吸痰后1分钟内,干预措施(F + 0.20和F 1.0)期间的S水平显著更高。此外,与基线相比,操作后立即出现P 、P 、心率和平均动脉压显著升高,仅在F + 0.20时VCO升高。在任何因变量方面,两组之间的基线值均未发现显著差异。
在机械通气的成年患者中,基线以上F + 0.20的高氧合可预防低氧血症。此外,容量式二氧化碳描记法分析证实了开放式吸痰时肺通气的短暂变化。(试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02440919)