Suppr超能文献

瑞典和西班牙的新型医疗服务提供模式:公立、私立还是非营利?评“治理、政府与新型医疗服务提供模式的探寻”一文

New Provider Models for Sweden and Spain: Public, Private or Non-profit? Comment on "Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models".

机构信息

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, and Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Dec 1;5(12):721-723. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.87.

Abstract

Sweden and Spain experiment with different provider models to reform healthcare provision. Both models have in common that they extend the role of the for-profit sector in healthcare. As the analysis of Saltman and Duran demonstrates, privatisation is an ambiguous and contested strategy that is used for quite different purposes. In our comment, we emphasize that their analysis leaves questions open on the consequences of privatisation for the performance of healthcare and the role of the public sector in healthcare provision. Furthermore, we briefly address the absence of the option of healthcare provision by not-for-profit providers in the privatisation strategy of Sweden and Spain.

摘要

瑞典和西班牙尝试了不同的提供者模式来改革医疗保健服务。这两种模式的共同点是,它们扩大了营利性部门在医疗保健领域的作用。正如 Saltman 和 Duran 的分析所示,私有化是一种模糊且有争议的策略,它被用于截然不同的目的。在我们的评论中,我们强调他们的分析留下了一些问题,即私有化对医疗保健绩效和公共部门在医疗保健服务提供中的作用的影响。此外,我们简要地提到了瑞典和西班牙的私有化战略中缺乏非营利性提供者提供医疗服务的选择。

相似文献

2
Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 3;5(1):33-42. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.198.
4
The role of private non-profit healthcare organizations in NHS systems: Implications for the Portuguese hospital devolution program.
Health Policy. 2017 Jun;121(6):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
6
From public vs. private to public/private mix in healthcare: lessons from the Israeli and the Spanish cases.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Jun 24;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00391-4.
8
When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:215-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.045. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
The privatisation of healthcare system in Bangladesh.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Feb 11;32(1):97-107. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2017-0217.
10
Does privatisation of vocational rehabilitation improve labour market opportunities? Evidence from a field experiment in Sweden.
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34:59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

3
Provider Governance; A Basic Blackbox Seldom Looked at Properly: A Response to Recent Commentaries.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Dec 1;5(12):733-734. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.128.

本文引用的文献

1
Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Nov 3;5(1):33-42. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.198.
2
Results of the market-oriented reform in the Netherlands: a review.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Apr;11(2):161-78. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000353. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验