Radcliff Kris, Spivak Jeffrey, Darden Bruce, Janssen Michael, Bernard Thierry, Zigler Jack
Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Disease, New York, NY.
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Feb;31(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000476.
Long-term analysis of prospective randomized clinical trial data.
Lumbar total disk replacement (TDR) has been found to have equivalent or superior clinical outcomes compared with fusion and decreased radiographic incidence of adjacent level degeneration in single-level cases.
The purpose of this particular analysis was to determine the incidence and risk factors for secondary surgery in patients treated with TDR or circumferential fusion at 2 contiguous levels of the lumbar spine.
A total of 229 patients were treated and randomized to receive either TDR or circumferential fusion to treat degenerative disk disease at 2 contiguous levels between L3 and S1 (TDR, n=161; fusion, n=68).
Overall, at final 5-year follow-up, 9.6% of subjects underwent a secondary surgery in this study. The overall rate of adjacent segment disease was 3.5% (8/229). At 5 years, the percentage of subjects undergoing secondary surgeries was significantly lower in the TDR group versus fusion (5.6% vs. 19.1%, P=0.0027).Most secondary surgeries (65%, 17/26) occurred at the index levels. Index level secondary surgeries were most common in the fusion cohort (16.2%, 11/68 subjects) versus TDR (3.1%, 5/161 subjects, P=0.0009). There no statistically significant difference in the adjacent level reoperation rate between TDR (2.5%, 4/161) and fusion (5.9%, 4/68). The most common reason for index levels reoperation was instrumentation removal (n=9). Excluding the instrumentation removals, there was not a significant difference between the treatments in index level reoperations or in reoperations overall.
There were significantly fewer reoperations in TDR patients compared with fusion patients. However, most of the secondary surgeries were instrumentation removal in the fusion cohort. Discounting the instrumentation removals, there was no significant difference in reoperations between TDR and fusion. These results are indicative that lumbar TDR is noninferior to fusion.
前瞻性随机临床试验数据的长期分析。
与融合手术相比,腰椎全椎间盘置换术(TDR)已被发现具有相当或更好的临床疗效,并且在单节段病例中相邻节段退变的影像学发生率更低。
本次特定分析的目的是确定在腰椎连续两个节段接受TDR或环形融合治疗的患者二次手术的发生率及危险因素。
共有229例患者接受治疗并随机分为接受TDR或环形融合术,以治疗L3至S1之间连续两个节段的退行性椎间盘疾病(TDR组,n = 161;融合组,n = 68)。
总体而言,在最终的5年随访中,本研究中9.6%的受试者接受了二次手术。相邻节段疾病的总体发生率为3.5%(8/229)。在5年时,TDR组接受二次手术的受试者百分比显著低于融合组(5.6%对19.1%,P = 0.0027)。大多数二次手术(65%,17/26)发生在手术节段。手术节段的二次手术在融合队列中最为常见(16.2%,11/68例受试者),而在TDR组中为3.1%(5/161例受试者,P = 0.0009)。TDR组(2.5%,4/161)和融合组(5.9%,4/68)在相邻节段再次手术率方面无统计学显著差异。手术节段再次手术最常见的原因是内固定取出(n = 9)。排除内固定取出情况后,治疗组在手术节段再次手术或总体再次手术方面无显著差异。
与融合患者相比,TDR患者的再次手术明显更少。然而,融合队列中的大多数二次手术是内固定取出。不考虑内固定取出情况,TDR和融合在再次手术方面无显著差异。这些结果表明腰椎TDR不劣于融合术。