Rodrigues Natalia Almeida, Torsoni Adriana Souza, Fante Thais, Dos Reis Ivan Gustavo Masselli, Gobatto Claudio Alexandre, Manchado-Gobatto Fúlvia Barros
a Laboratory of Applied Sports Physiology, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
b Laboratory of Metabolic Disorders, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017 Jan;42(1):46-52. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0198. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
The intensity of lactate minimum (LM) has presented a good estimate of the intensity of maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS); however, this relationship has not yet been verified in the mouse model. We proposed validating the LM protocol for swimming mice by investigating the relationship among intensities of LM and MLSS as well as differences between sexes, in terms of aerobic capacity. Nineteen mice (male: 10, female: 9) were submitted to the evaluation protocols for LM and MLSS. The LM protocol consisted of hyperlactatemia induction (30 s exercise (13% body mass (bm)), 30 s resting pause and exhaustive exercise (13% bm), 9 min resting pause and incremental test). The LM underestimated MLSS (mice: 17.6%; male: 13.5%; female: 21.6%). Pearson's analysis showed a strong correlation among intensities of MLSS and LM (male (r = 0.67, p = 0.033); female (r = 0.86, p = 0.003)), but without agreement between protocols. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that bias was higher for females (1.5 (0.98) % bm; mean (MLSS and LM): 4.4%-6.4% bm) as compared with males (0.84 (1.24) % bm; mean (MLSS and LM): 4.5%-7.5% bm). The error associated with the estimated of intensity for males was lower when compared with the range of means for MLSS and LM. Therefore, the LM test could be used to determine individual aerobic intensity for males (considering the bias) but not females. Furthermore, the females supported higher intensities than the males. The differences in body mass between sexes could not explain the higher intensities supported by the females.
乳酸最低值(LM)的强度已能很好地估算最大乳酸稳态(MLSS)的强度;然而,这种关系尚未在小鼠模型中得到验证。我们建议通过研究LM和MLSS强度之间的关系以及性别之间在有氧能力方面的差异,来验证小鼠游泳的LM方案。19只小鼠(雄性:10只,雌性:9只)接受了LM和MLSS的评估方案。LM方案包括高乳酸血症诱导(30秒运动(体重的13%),30秒休息暂停和力竭运动(体重的13%),9分钟休息暂停和递增测试)。LM低估了MLSS(小鼠:17.6%;雄性:13.5%;雌性:21.6%)。Pearson分析显示MLSS和LM强度之间存在强相关性(雄性(r = 0.67,p = 0.033);雌性(r = 0.86,p = 0.003)),但方案之间不一致。Bland-Altman分析显示,与雄性(0.84(1.24)%体重;MLSS和LM的平均值:4.5%-7.5%体重)相比,雌性的偏差更高(1.5(0.98)%体重;MLSS和LM平均值:4.4%-6.4%体重)。与MLSS和LM平均值范围相比,雄性强度估计的误差较低。因此,LM测试可用于确定雄性的个体有氧强度(考虑偏差),但不能用于雌性。此外,雌性比雄性能承受更高的强度。性别之间的体重差异无法解释雌性能承受更高强度的原因。