• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国西部天然林与东南部人工林在森林破碎化和恢复方面的差异。

Evaluating differences in forest fragmentation and restoration between western natural forests and southeastern plantation forests in the United States.

作者信息

Ren Xinyu, Lv Yingying, Li Mingshi

机构信息

College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing 210037, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2017 Mar 1;188:268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.068. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.068
PMID:28006741
Abstract

Changes in forest ecosystem structure and functions are considered some of the research issues in landscape ecology. In this study, advancing Forman's theory, we considered five spatially explicit processes associated with fragmentation, including perforation, dissection, subdivision, shrinkage, and attrition, and two processes associated with restoration, i.e., increment and expansion processes. Following this theory, a forest fragmentation and restoration process model that can detect the spatially explicit processes and ecological consequences of forest landscape change was developed and tested in the current analysis. Using the National Land Cover Databases (2001, 2006 and 2011), the forest fragmentation and restoration process model was applied to US western natural forests and southeastern plantation forests to quantify and classify forest patch losses into one of the four fragmentation processes (the dissection process was merged into the subdivision process) and to classify the newly gained forest patches based on the two restoration processes. At the same time, the spatio-temporal differences in fragmentation and restoration patterns and trends between natural forests and plantations were further compared. Then, through overlaying the forest fragmentation/restoration processes maps with targeting year land cover data and land ownership vectors, the results from forest fragmentation and the contributors to forest restoration in federal and nonfederal lands were identified. Results showed that, in natural forests, the forest change patches concentrated around the urban/forest, cultivated/forest, and shrubland/forest interfaces, while the patterns of plantation change patches were scattered sparsely and irregularly. The shrinkage process was the most common type in forest fragmentation, and the average size was the smallest. Expansion, the most common restoration process, was observed in both natural forests and plantations and often occurred around the previous expansion or covered the previous subdivision or shrinkage processes. The overall temporal fragmentation pattern of natural forests had a "perforation-subdivision/shrinkage-attrition" pathway, which corresponded to Forman's landscape fragmentation rule, while the plantation forests did not follow the rule strictly. The main land cover types resulted from forest fragmentation in natural forests and plantation forests were shrubland and herbaceous, mainly through subdivision and shrinkages process. The processes and effects of restoration of plantation forests were more diverse and efficient, compared to the natural forest, which were simpler with a lower regrowth rate. The fragmentation mostly occurred in nonfederal lands. In natural forests, forest fragmentation pattern differed in different land tenures, yet plantations remained the same in federal and nonfederal lands.

摘要

森林生态系统结构和功能的变化被视为景观生态学中的一些研究问题。在本研究中,基于福尔曼的理论,我们考虑了与破碎化相关的五个空间明确过程,包括穿孔、分割、细分、收缩和磨损,以及与恢复相关的两个过程,即增加和扩展过程。遵循该理论,开发了一个能够检测森林景观变化的空间明确过程和生态后果的森林破碎化和恢复过程模型,并在当前分析中进行了测试。利用国家土地覆盖数据库(2001年、2006年和2011年),将森林破碎化和恢复过程模型应用于美国西部天然林和东南部人工林,以将森林斑块损失量化并分类为四种破碎化过程之一(分割过程合并到细分过程中),并根据两个恢复过程对新获得的森林斑块进行分类。同时,进一步比较了天然林和人工林在破碎化和恢复模式及趋势上的时空差异。然后,通过将森林破碎化/恢复过程图与目标年份的土地覆盖数据和土地所有权矢量叠加,确定了联邦土地和非联邦土地上森林破碎化的结果以及森林恢复的贡献因素。结果表明,在天然林中,森林变化斑块集中在城市/森林、耕地/森林和灌木林/森林界面周围,而人工林变化斑块的模式则稀疏且不规则地分散。收缩过程是森林破碎化中最常见的类型,且平均面积最小。扩展是最常见的恢复过程,在天然林和人工林中均有观察到,且通常发生在前一次扩展周围或覆盖前一次细分或收缩过程。天然林的总体时间破碎化模式具有“穿孔 - 细分/收缩 - 磨损”路径,这与福尔曼的景观破碎化规则相对应,而人工林则未严格遵循该规则。天然林和人工林中森林破碎化产生的主要土地覆盖类型是灌木林和草本植物,主要通过细分和收缩过程。与天然林相比,人工林的恢复过程和效果更加多样和高效,天然林的恢复过程更简单且再生率较低。破碎化大多发生在非联邦土地上。在天然林中,不同土地保有权的森林破碎化模式不同,但人工林在联邦土地和非联邦土地上保持相同。

相似文献

1
Evaluating differences in forest fragmentation and restoration between western natural forests and southeastern plantation forests in the United States.评估美国西部天然林与东南部人工林在森林破碎化和恢复方面的差异。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Mar 1;188:268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.068. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
2
Impacts of changes in land use and fragmentation patterns on Atlantic coastal forests in northern Spain.土地利用变化和破碎化模式对西班牙北部大西洋沿海森林的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Mar-Apr;91(4):879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
3
Forest dynamics in the U.S. indicate disproportionate attrition in western forests, rural areas and public lands.美国的森林动态表明,西部森林、农村地区和公共土地遭受了不成比例的损耗。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 22;12(2):e0171383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171383. eCollection 2017.
4
Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research.人类改造的热带景观中的多种演替途径:来自森林演替、森林破碎化和景观生态学研究的新见解。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):326-340. doi: 10.1111/brv.12231. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
5
Assessing Landscape Change and Processes of Recurrence, Replacement, and Recovery in the Southeastern Coastal Plains, USA.评估美国东南沿海平原的景观变化以及复发、替代和恢复过程。
Environ Manage. 2015 Nov;56(5):1252-71. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0574-1. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
6
Forest restoration: a global dataset for biodiversity and vegetation structure.森林恢复:生物多样性和植被结构的全球数据集。
Ecology. 2016 Aug;97(8):2167. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1474.
7
Spatially explicit modeling of 1992-2100 land cover and forest stand age for the conterminous United States.1992-2100 年美国本土土地覆被和林分年龄的空间显式建模。
Ecol Appl. 2014 Jul;24(5):1015-36. doi: 10.1890/13-1245.1.
8
Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests.评估土地利用对景观连通性的影响:美国西部森林的损失和破碎化。
Ecol Appl. 2011 Oct;21(7):2445-58. doi: 10.1890/10-1701.1.
9
A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system.油棕种植园生态系统功能综述,以森林为参考系统。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1539-1569. doi: 10.1111/brv.12295. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
Studying land use dynamics using decadal satellite images and Dyna-CLUE model in the Mahanadi River basin, India.利用十年期卫星图像和 Dyna-CLUE 模型研究印度马哈纳迪河流域的土地利用动态。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 27;191(Suppl 3):804. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7698-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Soil Microbial Community Structure and Assembly Process Under Different Forest Restoration Strategies in Cold Temperate Forests of Northeastern China.中国东北寒温带森林不同森林恢复策略下土壤微生物群落结构及组装过程的变化
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 9;13(6):1339. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061339.