Ren Xinyu, Lv Yingying, Li Mingshi
College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing 210037, China.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Mar 1;188:268-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.068. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
Changes in forest ecosystem structure and functions are considered some of the research issues in landscape ecology. In this study, advancing Forman's theory, we considered five spatially explicit processes associated with fragmentation, including perforation, dissection, subdivision, shrinkage, and attrition, and two processes associated with restoration, i.e., increment and expansion processes. Following this theory, a forest fragmentation and restoration process model that can detect the spatially explicit processes and ecological consequences of forest landscape change was developed and tested in the current analysis. Using the National Land Cover Databases (2001, 2006 and 2011), the forest fragmentation and restoration process model was applied to US western natural forests and southeastern plantation forests to quantify and classify forest patch losses into one of the four fragmentation processes (the dissection process was merged into the subdivision process) and to classify the newly gained forest patches based on the two restoration processes. At the same time, the spatio-temporal differences in fragmentation and restoration patterns and trends between natural forests and plantations were further compared. Then, through overlaying the forest fragmentation/restoration processes maps with targeting year land cover data and land ownership vectors, the results from forest fragmentation and the contributors to forest restoration in federal and nonfederal lands were identified. Results showed that, in natural forests, the forest change patches concentrated around the urban/forest, cultivated/forest, and shrubland/forest interfaces, while the patterns of plantation change patches were scattered sparsely and irregularly. The shrinkage process was the most common type in forest fragmentation, and the average size was the smallest. Expansion, the most common restoration process, was observed in both natural forests and plantations and often occurred around the previous expansion or covered the previous subdivision or shrinkage processes. The overall temporal fragmentation pattern of natural forests had a "perforation-subdivision/shrinkage-attrition" pathway, which corresponded to Forman's landscape fragmentation rule, while the plantation forests did not follow the rule strictly. The main land cover types resulted from forest fragmentation in natural forests and plantation forests were shrubland and herbaceous, mainly through subdivision and shrinkages process. The processes and effects of restoration of plantation forests were more diverse and efficient, compared to the natural forest, which were simpler with a lower regrowth rate. The fragmentation mostly occurred in nonfederal lands. In natural forests, forest fragmentation pattern differed in different land tenures, yet plantations remained the same in federal and nonfederal lands.
森林生态系统结构和功能的变化被视为景观生态学中的一些研究问题。在本研究中,基于福尔曼的理论,我们考虑了与破碎化相关的五个空间明确过程,包括穿孔、分割、细分、收缩和磨损,以及与恢复相关的两个过程,即增加和扩展过程。遵循该理论,开发了一个能够检测森林景观变化的空间明确过程和生态后果的森林破碎化和恢复过程模型,并在当前分析中进行了测试。利用国家土地覆盖数据库(2001年、2006年和2011年),将森林破碎化和恢复过程模型应用于美国西部天然林和东南部人工林,以将森林斑块损失量化并分类为四种破碎化过程之一(分割过程合并到细分过程中),并根据两个恢复过程对新获得的森林斑块进行分类。同时,进一步比较了天然林和人工林在破碎化和恢复模式及趋势上的时空差异。然后,通过将森林破碎化/恢复过程图与目标年份的土地覆盖数据和土地所有权矢量叠加,确定了联邦土地和非联邦土地上森林破碎化的结果以及森林恢复的贡献因素。结果表明,在天然林中,森林变化斑块集中在城市/森林、耕地/森林和灌木林/森林界面周围,而人工林变化斑块的模式则稀疏且不规则地分散。收缩过程是森林破碎化中最常见的类型,且平均面积最小。扩展是最常见的恢复过程,在天然林和人工林中均有观察到,且通常发生在前一次扩展周围或覆盖前一次细分或收缩过程。天然林的总体时间破碎化模式具有“穿孔 - 细分/收缩 - 磨损”路径,这与福尔曼的景观破碎化规则相对应,而人工林则未严格遵循该规则。天然林和人工林中森林破碎化产生的主要土地覆盖类型是灌木林和草本植物,主要通过细分和收缩过程。与天然林相比,人工林的恢复过程和效果更加多样和高效,天然林的恢复过程更简单且再生率较低。破碎化大多发生在非联邦土地上。在天然林中,不同土地保有权的森林破碎化模式不同,但人工林在联邦土地和非联邦土地上保持相同。