Goozee Rhianna, O'Daly Owen, Handley Rowena, Reis Marques Tiago, Taylor Heather, McQueen Grant, Hubbard Kathryn, Pariante Carmine, Mondelli Valeria, Reinders Antje A T S, Dazzan Paola
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences (CNS), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1833-1845. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23485. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
The dopaminergic system plays a key role in motor function and motor abnormalities have been shown to be a specific feature of psychosis. Due to their dopaminergic action, antipsychotic drugs may be expected to modulate motor function, but the precise effects of these drugs on motor function remain unclear. We carried out a within-subject, double-blind, randomized study of the effects of aripiprazole, haloperidol and placebo on motor function in 20 healthy men. For each condition, motor performance on an auditory-paced task was investigated. We entered maps of neural activation into a random effects general linear regression model to investigate motor function main effects. Whole-brain imaging revealed a significant treatment effect in a distributed network encompassing posterior orbitofrontal/anterior insula cortices, and the inferior temporal and postcentral gyri. Post-hoc comparison of treatments showed neural activation after aripiprazole did not differ significantly from placebo in either voxel-wise or region of interest analyses, with the results above driven primarily by haloperidol. We also observed a simple main effect of haloperidol compared with placebo, with increased task-related recruitment of posterior cingulate and precentral gyri. Furthermore, region of interest analyses revealed greater activation following haloperidol compared with placebo in the precentral and post-central gyri, and the putamen. These diverse modifications in cortical motor activation may relate to the different pharmacological profiles of haloperidol and aripiprazole, although the specific mechanisms underlying these differences remain unclear. Evaluating healthy individuals can allow investigation of the effects of different antipsychotics on cortical activation, independently of either disease-related pathology or previous treatment. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1833-1845, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
多巴胺能系统在运动功能中起关键作用,运动异常已被证明是精神病的一个特定特征。由于其多巴胺能作用,抗精神病药物可能会调节运动功能,但这些药物对运动功能的确切影响仍不清楚。我们对20名健康男性进行了一项关于阿立哌唑、氟哌啶醇和安慰剂对运动功能影响的受试者内双盲随机研究。针对每种情况,研究了听觉节奏任务中的运动表现。我们将神经激活图输入随机效应一般线性回归模型,以研究运动功能的主要影响。全脑成像显示,在一个包括眶额后皮质/岛叶前皮质、颞下回和中央后回的分布式网络中存在显著的治疗效果。事后治疗比较显示,在体素水平或感兴趣区域分析中,阿立哌唑后的神经激活与安慰剂没有显著差异,上述结果主要由氟哌啶醇驱动。我们还观察到与安慰剂相比,氟哌啶醇有一个简单的主效应,即后扣带回和中央前回与任务相关的募集增加。此外,感兴趣区域分析显示,与安慰剂相比,氟哌啶醇后中央前回、中央后回和壳核的激活更强。皮质运动激活的这些不同改变可能与氟哌啶醇和阿立哌唑不同的药理学特征有关,尽管这些差异背后的具体机制仍不清楚。评估健康个体可以独立于疾病相关病理或先前治疗来研究不同抗精神病药物对皮质激活的影响。《人类大脑图谱》38:1833 - 1845,2017年。©2017威利期刊公司。