• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的风险。

Predicting the risk of positive surgical margins following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Alchin David R, Murphy Declan, Lawrentschuk Nathan

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia -

University of Melbourne, Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):56-62. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02681-3. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02681-3
PMID:28009145
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The number of men receiving radical prostatectomy (RP) in Victoria, Australia, increased seven-fold in the period 1993-2010, and increasingly robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is being utilized over the open and laparoscopic approaches. The longer-term oncological outcomes of RARP are beginning to be reported in the literature. The objective of this review was to determine whether any preoperative variables may be associated with the occurrence of positive surgical margins (PSMs) following RARP and how these may translate into subsequent risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of English articles from 2005 to present was performed through a MEDLINE search. Search terms included "positive surgical margins", "biochemical recurrence", "radical prostatectomy" and "prostate cancer".

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

All studies included for review were retrospective analyses of series that reported on rates of PSM and BCR achieved with RARP, and considered potential factors that may influence the rates observed.

CONCLUSIONS

RARP appears to confer lower rates of PSM when compared to the established approaches. Recent reports included in this review indicate that RARP should be able to provide excellent oncological outcomes as a result.

摘要

引言

在1993年至2010年期间,澳大利亚维多利亚州接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的男性人数增加了七倍,与开放式和腹腔镜手术方法相比,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的使用越来越多。RARP的长期肿瘤学结果开始在文献中有所报道。本综述的目的是确定术前的任何变量是否可能与RARP术后手术切缘阳性(PSM)的发生相关,以及这些变量如何转化为随后的生化复发(BCR)风险。

证据收集

通过MEDLINE搜索对2005年至今的英文文章进行了系统综述。搜索词包括“手术切缘阳性”、“生化复发”、“根治性前列腺切除术”和“前列腺癌”。

证据综合

纳入综述的所有研究均为系列回顾性分析,报告了RARP实现的PSM和BCR发生率,并考虑了可能影响观察到的发生率的潜在因素。

结论

与既定方法相比,RARP似乎能降低PSM的发生率。本综述中纳入的近期报告表明,RARP因此应该能够提供出色的肿瘤学结果。

相似文献

1
Predicting the risk of positive surgical margins following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的风险。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):56-62. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02681-3. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
3
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术方法对高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中标本边缘和生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1481-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2021-9. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.评估非转移性前列腺癌中评估保留神经与不保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学结局和数据质量的研究:系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):690-700. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.标准腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1045-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5125-1. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.保留膀胱颈根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性相关研究的系统评价
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Nov 7;18(12):99. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0.
8
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.根治性前列腺切除术治疗非转移性前列腺癌的术者和医院手术量对肿瘤学和非肿瘤学结局影响的系统评价
Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):531-545. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer.局限性和局部晚期前列腺癌的新辅助和辅助激素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006019.pub2.
10
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术比腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术具有更低的生化复发率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 May;58(3):152-163. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.152. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal diseases: a bibliometric and visualization.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道疾病的全球趋势与热点:一项文献计量学与可视化分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 2;19(1):547. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02722-6.
2
Tumor Biological Feature and Its Association with Positive Surgical Margins and Apical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy in Non-Metastasis Prostate Cancer.非转移性前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤生物学特征与切缘阳性及尖部切缘的关系。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Apr 13;28(2):1528-1536. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020144.
3
Positive association between preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and risk of the status of positive surgical margins by prostate cancer: results in 497 consecutive patients treated only by radical prostatectomy.
术前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值与前列腺癌手术切缘阳性状态风险之间的正相关关系:497例仅接受根治性前列腺切除术的连续患者的结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1133-1142. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1447.
4
The value of transperineal apical prostate biopsy in predicting urethral/apical margin status after radical prostatectomy.经会阴前列腺尖部活检在预测根治性前列腺切除术后尿道/尖部切缘状态中的价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017633.
5
Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.外科医生手术量和体重指数对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性风险的影响:732例病例结果
Arab J Urol. 2019 May 30;17(3):234-242. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1619276. eCollection 2019.
6
Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.开发和验证一种用于预测腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的术前列线图。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Apr 20;132(8):928-934. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000161.