Tai Sherrica, Fantegrossi William E
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine, Mail Slot 638, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR, 72207, USA.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, 2301 MSRB III, 1150 W. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2017;32:249-262. doi: 10.1007/7854_2016_60.
Commercial preparations containing synthetic cannabinoids (SCBs) are rapidly emerging as drugs of abuse. Although often assumed to be "safe" and "legal" alternatives to cannabis, reports indicate that SCBs induce toxicity not often associated with the primary psychoactive component of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-THC). This chapter will summarize the evidence that use of SCBs poses greater health risks relative to marijuana and suggest that distinct pharmacological properties and metabolism of SCBs relative to Δ-THC may contribute to this increased toxicity. Studies reviewed will indicate that in contrast to partial agonist properties of Δ-THC typically observed in vitro, SCBs act as full CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists both in cellular assays and animal studies. Furthermore, unlike Δ-THC metabolism, several SCB metabolites retain high affinity for and exhibit a range of intrinsic activities at CB1 and CB2 receptors. Finally, the potential for SCBs to cause adverse drug-drug interactions with other drugs of abuse, as well as with common therapeutic agents, will be discussed. Collectively, the evidence provided in this chapter indicates that SCBs should not be considered safe and legal alternatives to marijuana. Instead, the enhanced toxicity of SCBs relative to marijuana, perhaps resulting from the combined actions of a complex mixture of different SCBs present and their active metabolites that retain high affinity for CB1 and CB2 receptors, highlights the inherent danger that may accompany use of these substances.
含有合成大麻素(SCBs)的商业制剂正迅速成为滥用药物。尽管人们通常认为它们是大麻的“安全”和“合法”替代品,但报告显示,合成大麻素会引发一些毒性,而这些毒性并不常与大麻的主要精神活性成分Δ9-四氢大麻酚(Δ-THC)相关。本章将总结相关证据,即相对于大麻,使用合成大麻素带来的健康风险更大,并指出合成大麻素相对于Δ-THC具有独特的药理特性和代谢过程,这可能导致其毒性增加。所回顾的研究将表明,与通常在体外观察到的Δ-THC的部分激动剂特性不同,合成大麻素在细胞试验和动物研究中均表现为CB1和CB2受体的完全激动剂。此外,与Δ-THC的代谢不同,几种合成大麻素代谢物对CB1和CB2受体保持高亲和力并表现出一系列内在活性。最后,还将讨论合成大麻素与其他滥用药物以及常见治疗药物发生不良药物相互作用的可能性。总体而言,本章提供的证据表明,合成大麻素不应被视为大麻的安全合法替代品。相反,合成大麻素相对于大麻的毒性增强,可能是由于存在的不同合成大麻素及其对CB1和CB2受体保持高亲和力的活性代谢物的复杂混合物的联合作用所致,这凸显了使用这些物质可能伴随的内在危险。