• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师版芬兰语运动观察问卷的信度与效度

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers.

作者信息

Asunta P, Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Cantell M, Westerholm J, Schoemaker M M, Rintala P

机构信息

Department of Sport Sciences, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

Department of Education, Special Education Unit, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Jun;53:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.006
PMID:28012789
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Observational screening instruments are often used as an effective, economical first step in the identification of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T-FI).

METHODS

The psychometric properties were tested using two separate samples (S1: age range 6-12, M 9y 5mo, females 101, males 92; S2: age range 6-9, M 7y 7mo, females 404, males 446). Teachers completed the MOQ-T-FI in both samples, and in sample 2 teachers' ratings were compared to student's performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2). Internal consistency was investigated by using Cronbach's alpha, predictive validity by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, concurrent validity by correlation analysis, and construct validity by factor analysis.

RESULTS

The MOQ-T-FI behaves consistently with its original Dutch version. The internal consistency was excellent (α=0.97). The bifactor model, with one general factor and two specific factors, fit the data significantly better than the first-order model. The concurrent validity with the MABC-2 was moderate (r=0.37 p<0.001). Sensitivity was 82.5% and specificity 44.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Notwithstanding the low specificity the MOQ-T-FI can be considered as a promising screening tool in the school environment for Finnish children at risk of motor learning problems.

摘要

目的

观察性筛查工具常被用作识别发育性协调障碍(DCD)儿童的有效且经济的第一步。本研究旨在调查芬兰语版教师运动观察问卷(MOQ-T-FI)的心理测量特性。

方法

使用两个独立样本对心理测量特性进行测试(样本1:年龄范围6 - 12岁,平均年龄9岁5个月,女性101名,男性92名;样本2:年龄范围6 - 9岁,平均年龄7岁7个月,女性404名,男性446名)。两个样本中的教师均完成了MOQ-T-FI,在样本2中,将教师评分与学生在儿童运动评估量表第二版(MABC - 2)上的表现进行比较。采用Cronbach's alpha系数研究内部一致性,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析研究预测效度,通过相关分析研究同时效度,通过因子分析研究结构效度。

结果

MOQ-T-FI的表现与其原始荷兰语版本一致。内部一致性极佳(α = 0.97)。具有一个一般因子和两个特定因子的双因子模型对数据的拟合明显优于一阶模型。与MABC - 2的同时效度中等(r = 0.37,p < 0.001)。敏感性分别为82.5%,特异性为44.5%。

结论

尽管特异性较低,但MOQ-T-FI可被视为学校环境中对有运动学习问题风险的芬兰儿童有前景的筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers.教师版芬兰语运动观察问卷的信度与效度
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Jun;53:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
2
Identifying developmental coordination disorder: MOQ-T validity as a fast screening instrument based on teachers' ratings and its relationship with praxic and visuospatial working memory deficits.识别发育性协调障碍:基于教师评分的运动问卷 - 教师版(MOQ-T)作为快速筛查工具的有效性及其与动作和视觉空间工作记忆缺陷的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Dec;35(12):3518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
3
Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder.教师使用的运动观察问卷作为发育性协调障碍风险儿童筛查工具的效度。
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Apr;27(2):190-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Canadian Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for Preschool Children.加拿大学龄前儿童发育性协调障碍小问卷的心理测量特性。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015 May;35(2):116-31. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.980928. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
5
Age-related validity and reliability of the Dutch Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ-NL).荷兰儿童发育协调障碍问卷(LDCDQ-NL)的年龄相关性效度和信度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jan;84:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
The reliability and validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire'07 for children aged 4-6 years in mainland China.《发育性协调障碍问卷(2007版)》在中国大陆4至6岁儿童中的信效度研究
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Dec;47:405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Psychometric properties of the DCD-Q-07 in children ages to 4-6.DCD-Q-07在4至6岁儿童中的心理测量特性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Feb;35(2):330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
8
Validity and reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Checklist for children with and without motor impairments.运动评估电池儿童-2 检查表对有和没有运动障碍的儿童的有效性和可靠性。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Apr;54(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04226.x. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
9
Age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition: exploring its usefulness in mainland China.年龄组 1 的儿童运动评估电池-第二版:探索其在中国内地的有用性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Feb;34(2):801-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
10
Movement assessment battery for children-2: translation, reliability, and validity for Brazilian children.儿童运动评估量表第二版:巴西儿童的翻译、信度和效度
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Mar;35(3):733-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.028. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Motor and cognitive skills implicated in the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T): A multidisciplinary approach.教师运动观察问卷(MOQ-T)中涉及的运动和认知技能:一种多学科方法。
Heliyon. 2023 May 25;9(6):e16659. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16659. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Criterion Validity and Applicability of Motor Screening Instruments in Children Aged 5-6 Years: A Systematic Review.5-6 岁儿童运动筛查工具的效标效度和适用性:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020781.
3
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.
系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
4
Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties - a systematic review.观察工具识别运动困难的心理测量学特性——系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 7;19(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6.
5
International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder – Chinese (Mandarin) translation.发育性协调障碍的定义、诊断、评估、干预及心理社会方面的国际临床实践建议——中文(普通话)翻译
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jul;61(7):e1. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14274.
6
International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder.国际临床实践建议:发育性协调障碍的定义、诊断、评估、干预和心理社会方面。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Mar;61(3):242-285. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14132. Epub 2019 Jan 22.