Spink C, Avanesov M, Schmidt T, Grass M, Schoen G, Adam G, Bannas P, Koops A
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:284-288. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
To compare patient radiation dose in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) implantation before and after an imaging-processing technology upgrade.
In our retrospective single-center-study, cumulative air kerma (AK), cumulative dose area product (DAP), total fluoroscopy time and contrast agent were collected from an age- and BMI-matched collective of 108 patients undergoing TIPS implantation. 54 procedures were performed before and 54 after the technology upgrade. Mean values were calculated and compared using two-tailed t-tests. Two blinded, independent readers assessed DSA image quality using a four-rank likert scale and the Wilcoxcon test.
The new technology demonstrated a significant reduction of 57% of mean DAP (402.8 vs. 173.3Gycm, p<0.001) and a significant reduction of 58% of mean AK (1.7 vs. 0.7Gy, p<0.001) compared to the precursor technology. Time of fluoroscopy (26.4 vs. 27.8min, p=0.45) and amount of contrast agent (109.4 vs. 114.9ml, p=0.62) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The DSA image quality of the new technology was not inferior (2.66 vs. 2.77, p=0.56).
In our study the new imaging technology halved radiation dose in patients undergoing TIPS maintaining sufficient image quality without a significant increase in radiation time or contrast consumption.
比较经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)植入患者在成像处理技术升级前后的辐射剂量。
在我们的回顾性单中心研究中,从108例接受TIPS植入的年龄和体重指数匹配的患者群体中收集累积空气比释动能(AK)、累积剂量面积乘积(DAP)、总透视时间和造影剂用量。技术升级前进行了54例手术,升级后进行了54例。计算平均值并使用双尾t检验进行比较。两名盲法、独立的阅片者使用四级李克特量表和威尔科克森检验评估DSA图像质量。
与前体技术相比,新技术使平均DAP显著降低了57%(402.8对173.3Gycm,p<0.001),平均AK显著降低了58%(1.7对0.7Gy,p<0.001)。两组之间的透视时间(26.4对27.8分钟,p=0.45)和造影剂用量(109.4对114.9ml,p=0.62)没有显著差异。新技术的DSA图像质量并不逊色(2.66对2.77,p=0.56)。
在我们的研究中,新的成像技术使接受TIPS的患者辐射剂量减半,同时保持了足够的图像质量,而辐射时间或造影剂用量没有显著增加。