Suppr超能文献

阵发性心房颤动伴严重左心房瘢痕患者的长期随访:肺静脉窦隔离术与肺静脉隔离术联合瘢痕匀化或触发灶消融术的比较。

Long-term follow-up of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and severe left atrial scarring: comparison between pulmonary vein antrum isolation only or pulmonary vein isolation combined with either scar homogenization or trigger ablation.

机构信息

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N. IH-35, Suite 720, Austin, TX 78705, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Europace. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1790-1797. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw338.

Abstract

AIMS

Left atrial (LA) scarring, a consequence of cardiac fibrosis is a powerful predictor of procedure-outcome in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing catheter ablation. We sought to compare the long-term outcome in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and severe LA scarring identified by 3D mapping, undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) only or PVAI and the entire scar areas (scar homogenization) or PVAI+ ablation of the non-PV triggers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Totally, 177 consecutive patients with PAF and severe LA scarring were included. Patients underwent PVAI only (n = 45, Group 1), PVAI+ scar homogenization (n = 66, Group 2) or PVAI+ ablation of non-PV triggers (n = 66, Group 3) based on operator's choice. Baseline characteristics were similar across the groups. After first procedure, all patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. The success rate at the end of the follow-up was 18% (8 pts), 21% (14 pts), and 61% (40 pts) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cumulative probability of AF-free survival was significantly higher in Group 3 (overall log-rank P <0.01, pairwise comparison 1 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 3 P < 0.01). During repeat procedures, non-PV triggers were ablated in all. After average 1.5 procedures, the success rates were 28 (62%), 41 (62%), and 56 (85%) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (log-rank P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PAF and severe LA scarring, PVAI+ ablation of non-PV triggers is associated with significantly better long-term outcome than PVAI alone or PVAI+ scar homogenization.

摘要

目的

左心房(LA)瘢痕是心脏纤维化的结果,是房颤(AF)患者导管消融后程序结果的有力预测指标。我们旨在比较经 3D 标测识别阵发性 AF(PAF)和严重 LA 瘢痕的患者在接受单纯肺静脉隔离(PVAI)、PVAI 联合整个瘢痕区域(瘢痕匀化)或 PVAI+非 PV 触发灶消融后的长期结果。

方法和结果

共纳入 177 例 PAF 伴严重 LA 瘢痕的连续患者。根据术者选择,患者接受单纯 PVAI(n=45,组 1)、PVAI+瘢痕匀化(n=66,组 2)或 PVAI+非 PV 触发灶消融(n=66,组 3)。各组间基线特征相似。初次手术后,所有患者至少随访 2 年。在随访结束时,1 组、2 组和 3 组的成功率分别为 18%(8 例)、21%(14 例)和 61%(40 例)。3 组的 AF 无复发生存率明显较高(总体对数秩 P<0.01,两两比较 1 与 3 及 2 与 3,P<0.01)。在重复手术中,所有患者均消融了非 PV 触发灶。平均进行 1.5 次手术时,1 组、2 组和 3 组的成功率分别为 28%(62%)、41%(62%)和 56%(85%)(对数秩 P<0.001)。

结论

在 PAF 伴严重 LA 瘢痕的患者中,与单纯 PVAI 或 PVAI+瘢痕匀化相比,PVAI+非 PV 触发灶消融与更好的长期结果相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验