Suppr超能文献

吸入一氧化氮治疗早产儿呼吸衰竭

Inhaled nitric oxide for respiratory failure in preterm infants.

作者信息

Barrington Keith J, Finer Neil, Pennaforte Thomas

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, CHU Ste-Justine, 3175 Cote Ste Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 1C5.

Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, California, USA, 92103-8774.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 3;1(1):CD000509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000509.pub5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is effective in term infants with hypoxic respiratory failure. The pathophysiology of respiratory failure and the potential risks of iNO differ substantially in preterm infants, necessitating specific study in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine effects of treatment with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) on death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) or other serious brain injury and on adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm newborn infants with hypoxic respiratory failure.Owing to substantial variation in study eligibility criteria, which decreases the utility of an overall analysis, we divided participants post hoc into three groups: (1) infants treated over the first three days of life because of defects in oxygenation, (2) preterm infants with evidence of pulmonary disease treated routinely with iNO and (3) infants treated later (after three days of age) because of elevated risk of BPD.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Healthstar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library through January 2016. We also searched the abstracts of the Pediatric Academic Societies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible for inclusion were randomised and quasi-randomised studies in preterm infants with respiratory disease that compared effects of iNO gas versus control, with or without placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 17 randomised controlled trials of iNO therapy in preterm infants. We grouped these trials post hoc into three categories on the basis of entry criteria: treatment during the first three days of life for impaired oxygenation, routine use in preterm babies along with respiratory support and later treatment for infants at increased risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). We performed no overall analyses.Eight trials providing early rescue treatment for infants on the basis of oxygenation criteria demonstrated no significant effect of iNO on mortality or BPD (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.01; 958 infants). Four studies examining routine use of iNO in infants with pulmonary disease reported no significant reduction in death or BPD (typical RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.02; 1924 infants), although this small effect approached significance. Later treatment with iNO based on risk of BPD (three trials) revealed no significant benefit for this outcome in analyses of summary data (typical RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.01; 1075 infants).Investigators found no clear effect of iNO on the frequency of all grades of IVH nor severe IVH. Early rescue treatment was associated with a non-significant 20% increase in severe IVH.We found no effect on the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: iNO does not appear to be effective as rescue therapy for the very ill preterm infant. Early routine use of iNO in preterm infants with respiratory disease does not prevent serious brain injury or improve survival without BPD. Later use of iNO to prevent BPD could be effective, but current 95% confidence intervals include no effect; the effect size is likely small (RR 0.92) and requires further study.

摘要

背景

吸入一氧化氮(iNO)对足月低氧性呼吸衰竭婴儿有效。呼吸衰竭的病理生理学以及iNO的潜在风险在早产儿中差异很大,因此有必要在这一人群中进行专门研究。

目的

确定吸入一氧化氮(iNO)治疗对低氧性呼吸衰竭早产儿死亡、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)、脑室内出血(IVH)或其他严重脑损伤以及长期不良神经发育结局的影响。由于研究纳入标准差异很大,降低了整体分析的效用,我们事后将参与者分为三组:(1)因氧合缺陷在出生后前三天接受治疗的婴儿;(2)有肺部疾病证据且常规接受iNO治疗的早产儿;(3)因BPD风险增加而在出生三天后接受治疗的婴儿。

检索方法

我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法。我们检索了截至2016年1月的MEDLINE、Embase、Healthstar以及Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。我们还检索了儿科学术协会的摘要。

选择标准

符合纳入条件的是对患有呼吸系统疾病的早产儿进行的随机和半随机研究,比较了iNO气体与对照(有或无安慰剂)的效果。

数据收集与分析

我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法,并应用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法来评估证据质量。

主要结果

我们找到了17项关于iNO治疗早产儿的随机对照试验。我们根据纳入标准将这些试验事后分为三类:因氧合受损在出生后前三天进行的治疗、在早产儿中与呼吸支持一起常规使用以及对支气管肺发育不良(BPD)风险增加的婴儿进行的后期治疗。我们未进行整体分析。八项基于氧合标准为婴儿提供早期抢救治疗的试验表明,iNO对死亡率或BPD无显著影响(典型风险比(RR)0.94,95%置信区间(CI)0.87至1.01;958名婴儿)。四项研究了iNO在患有肺部疾病婴儿中的常规使用情况,报告称死亡或BPD没有显著降低(典型RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87至1.02;1924名婴儿),尽管这种微小影响接近显著水平。基于BPD风险的iNO后期治疗(三项试验)在汇总数据分析中显示对该结局无显著益处(典型RR 0.92,95% CI 0.85至1.01;1075名婴儿)。研究人员发现iNO对所有级别的IVH频率或重度IVH均无明显影响。早期抢救治疗与重度IVH非显著增加20%相关。我们发现对神经发育障碍的发生率没有影响。

作者结论

iNO似乎对病情严重的早产儿作为抢救治疗无效。在患有呼吸系统疾病的早产儿中早期常规使用iNO并不能预防严重脑损伤或提高无BPD情况下的生存率。后期使用iNO预防BPD可能有效,但目前95%的置信区间包括无效果;效应大小可能较小(RR 0.92),需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验