1Department of Neurosurgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama.
2Department of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University, Shizuoka Hospital, Izunokuni, Shizuoka; and.
J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1307-1314. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161634. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
OBJECTIVE Advanced age is known to be associated with a poor prognosis after surgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Keyhole clipping techniques have been introduced for less invasive treatment of UIAs. In this study, the authors compared the complications and clinical and radiological outcomes after keyhole clipping between nonfrail elderly patients (≥ 70 years) and nonelderly patients. METHODS Keyhole clipping (either supraorbital or pterional) was performed to treat 260 cases of relatively small (≤ 10 mm) anterior circulation UIAs. There were 62 cases in the nonfrail elderly group (mean age 72.9 ± 2.6 years [± SD]) and 198 cases in the nonelderly group (mean age 59.5 ± 7.6 years). The authors evaluated mortality and morbidity (modified Rankin Scale score > 2 or Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score < 24) at 3 months and 1 year after the operation, the general cognitive function by MMSE at 3 months and 1 year, anxiety and depression by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) at 3 months, and radiological abnormalities and recurrence at 1 year. RESULTS Basic characteristics including comorbidities, frailty, and BDI and HAM-D scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups, whereas the MMSE score was slightly but significantly lower in the elderly group. Aneurysm location, largest diameter, type of keyhole surgery, neck clipping rate, and hospitalization period were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The incidence of chronic subdural hematoma was not significantly higher in the elderly group than in the nonelderly group (8.1% vs 4.5%, p = 0.332); rates of other complications including stroke and epilepsy were not significantly different. Lacunar infarction occurred in 3.2% of the elderly group and 3.0% of the nonelderly group. No patient in the elderly group required re-treatment or demonstrated recurrence of clipped aneurysms. The MMSE score at 3 months significantly improved in the nonelderly group but did not change in the elderly group. The BDI and HAM-D scores at 3 months were significantly improved in both groups. No patient died in either group. The morbidity at 3 months and 1 year in the elderly group (1.6% and 4.8%, respectively) was not significantly different from that in the nonelderly group (2.0% and 1.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Keyhole clipping for nonfrail elderly patients with relatively small anterior circulation UIAs did not significantly increase the complication, mortality, or morbidity rate; hospitalization period; or aneurysm recurrence compared with nonelderly patients, and it was associated with improvement in anxiety and depression. Keyhole clipping to treat UIAs in the nonfrail elderly is an effective and long-lasting treatment.
已知高龄与未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)手术后的预后不良有关。微创治疗 UIAs 的锁孔夹闭技术已经问世。在这项研究中,作者比较了非脆弱老年患者(≥70 岁)和非老年患者接受锁孔夹闭后的并发症、临床和影像学结果。
对 260 例相对较小(≤10mm)的前循环 UIAs 采用锁孔夹闭(眶上或翼点)治疗。非脆弱老年组有 62 例(平均年龄 72.9±2.6 岁[±标准差]),非老年组 198 例(平均年龄 59.5±7.6 岁)。作者评估了术后 3 个月和 1 年的死亡率和发病率(改良 Rankin 量表评分>2 或简易精神状态检查[MMSE]评分<24)、术后 3 个月和 1 年的一般认知功能(MMSE)、术后 3 个月的焦虑和抑郁(贝克抑郁量表[BDI]和汉密尔顿抑郁量表[HAM-D])以及术后 1 年的影像学异常和复发情况。
两组的基本特征(包括合并症、脆弱性、BDI 和 HAM-D 评分)无显著差异,而老年组的 MMSE 评分略低,但差异有统计学意义。两组动脉瘤位置、最大直径、锁孔手术类型、颈夹闭率和住院时间无显著差异。老年组慢性硬膜下血肿的发生率与非老年组无显著差异(8.1%比 4.5%,p=0.332);其他并发症(中风和癫痫)的发生率也无显著差异。老年组腔隙性梗死发生率为 3.2%,非老年组为 3.0%。老年组无患者需要再次治疗或显示夹闭动脉瘤复发。非老年组的 MMSE 评分在术后 3 个月显著改善,而老年组无显著变化。两组的 BDI 和 HAM-D 评分在术后 3 个月均显著改善。两组均无患者死亡。老年组(分别为 1.6%和 4.8%)的术后 3 个月和 1 年的发病率与非老年组(分别为 2.0%和 1.5%)无显著差异。
对于相对较小的前循环 UIAs 的非脆弱老年患者,与非老年患者相比,锁孔夹闭术并不会显著增加并发症、死亡率或发病率、住院时间或动脉瘤复发率,并且与焦虑和抑郁的改善有关。锁孔夹闭术治疗非脆弱老年患者的 UIAs 是一种有效且持久的治疗方法。