Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Pediatrics, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2017 Oct;116(10):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) for fusion transcripts and flow cytometry for leukemia-specific markers are widely used for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but the relation between the results of either method is unclear. METHODS: Mononucleated cells from 108 bone marrow samples collected from 55 B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients (30 with t(12;21)/ETV6-RUNX1, 16 with t(9;22)/BCR-ABL1 and nine with t(1;19)/TCF3-PBX1) were examined in tandem by RQ-PCR and six-color flow cytometry. RESULTS: MRD results were concordant in 91 of the 108 paired samples (84.2%; K=0.690); 49 samples were MRD-negative while 42 were MRD-positive by both methods, with < 1 log difference in positive MRD estimates in 39 samples (92.9%). Of the 17 discordant samples, 16 were MRD-positive by RQ-PCR but MRD-negative by flow cytometry; the opposite was true in one sample. Kappa value/concordance was 0.690/85.0% (n = 60) for ETV6-RUNX1, 0.842/93.3% (n = 15) for TCF3-PBX1, and 0.535/78.8% (n = 33) for BCR-ABL1. Specific immunophenotypic abnormalities were more prevalent in each genetic subgroup, such as CD38 underexpression, CD58 overexpression, and CD34 overexpression in ETV6-RUNX1, TCF3-PBX1, and BCR-ABL1, respectively. CONCLUSION: In most follow-up samples, MRD estimates by two methods are in agreement, especially in patients with TCF3-PBX1.
背景/目的:实时定量聚合酶链反应(RQ-PCR)用于融合转录本和流式细胞术用于白血病特异性标志物,广泛用于急性淋巴细胞白血病的微小残留病(MRD)检测,但两种方法的结果之间的关系尚不清楚。 方法:对 55 例 B 前体急性淋巴细胞白血病患者(30 例 t(12;21)/ETV6-RUNX1,16 例 t(9;22)/BCR-ABL1,9 例 t(1;19)/TCF3-PBX1)的 108 个骨髓样本的单核细胞进行了 RQ-PCR 和六色流式细胞术的串联检测。 结果:在 108 对配对样本中的 91 对(84.2%;K=0.690)MRD 结果一致;49 个样本为 MRD 阴性,而两种方法均为 MRD 阳性,39 个样本(92.9%)的阳性 MRD 估计值相差<1 个对数级。在 17 个不一致的样本中,16 个样本 RQ-PCR 为 MRD 阳性,但流式细胞术为 MRD 阴性;一个样本则相反。对于 ETV6-RUNX1,Kappa 值/一致性为 0.690/85.0%(n=60),对于 TCF3-PBX1,为 0.842/93.3%(n=15),对于 BCR-ABL1,为 0.535/78.8%(n=33)。每种遗传亚组中更常见特定免疫表型异常,例如 ETV6-RUNX1 中 CD38 表达不足,TCF3-PBX1 中 CD58 过度表达,BCR-ABL1 中 CD34 过度表达。 结论:在大多数随访样本中,两种方法的 MRD 估计值是一致的,尤其是在 TCF3-PBX1 患者中。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2013-6-26
Int J Mol Sci. 2020-2-5
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018-12