• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗前的表观扩散系数值是临界可切除胰腺癌患者组织学反应的预测指标。

Value of apparent diffusion coefficient prior to neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of histologic response in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.

作者信息

Okada Ken-Ichi, Hirono Seiko, Kawai Manabu, Miyazawa Motoki, Shimizu Atsushi, Kitahata Yuji, Ueno Masaki, Hayami Shinya, Kojima Fumiyoshi, Yamaue Hiroki

机构信息

Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.

Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Mar;24(3):161-168. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.430.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.430
PMID:28064462
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The parameters to predict histological response to neoadjuvant therapy remain controversial in borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma (BRPC).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients who underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) prior to expected neoadjuvant chemo/chemoradiotherapy and surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Analyses for correlation between percent tumor cell destruction and the following was performed to investigate the parameter and cut off value: tumor size, whole tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of DW-MRI, maximum standardized uptake value of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and their change ratios. The selected parameter was assessed for prediction ability of the histological response to neoadjuvant chemo/chemoradiotherapy and R0 curability.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment ADC value was correlated with tumor cell destruction rate among all parameters (R = 0.625, P = 0.001). The ADC cut-off value for discriminating between nonresponders (grade I) and responders (grade IIa and more) after treatment was determined as 1.20 × 10  mm /s and the sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 75%; accuracy, 83% for responder, and the sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 63%; accuracy, 71% for R0 curability.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment ADC value appeared to be a predictor of R0 curability in BRPC patients because of effective histological response to neoadjuvant therapy, and there was a significant correlation between the baseline ADC value and histological tumor cell destruction rate.

摘要

背景

在可切除边缘的胰腺癌(BRPC)中,预测新辅助治疗组织学反应的参数仍存在争议。

方法

回顾性分析24例在预期新辅助化疗/放化疗及手术前接受扩散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)的患者。分析肿瘤细胞破坏百分比与以下因素之间的相关性,以研究参数和临界值:肿瘤大小、DW-MRI的全肿瘤表观扩散系数(ADC)值、F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描的最大标准化摄取值、糖类抗原19-9及其变化率。评估所选参数对新辅助化疗/放化疗组织学反应和R0治愈率的预测能力。

结果

在所有参数中,治疗前ADC值与肿瘤细胞破坏率相关(R = 0.625,P = 0.001)。治疗后区分无反应者(I级)和有反应者(IIa级及以上)的ADC临界值确定为1.20×10⁻³mm²/s,对于有反应者,敏感性为100%;特异性为75%;准确性为83%,对于R0治愈率,敏感性为100%;特异性为63%;准确性为71%。

结论

由于对新辅助治疗有有效的组织学反应,治疗前ADC值似乎是BRPC患者R0治愈率的预测指标,且基线ADC值与组织学肿瘤细胞破坏率之间存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
Value of apparent diffusion coefficient prior to neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of histologic response in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.新辅助治疗前的表观扩散系数值是临界可切除胰腺癌患者组织学反应的预测指标。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Mar;24(3):161-168. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.430.
2
Diffusion-weighted MRI predicts the histologic response for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a prospective study (DIFFERENT trial).扩散加权 MRI 预测新辅助治疗胰腺癌患者的组织学反应:一项前瞻性研究(DIFFERENT 试验)。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Feb;405(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01857-4. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
Evaluation of response using FDG-PET/CT and diffusion weighted MRI after radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer: a non-randomized, monocentric phase II clinical trial-PaCa-DD-041 (Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11).评价胰腺癌放化疗后使用 FDG-PET/CT 和弥散加权 MRI 的疗效:一项非随机、单中心 II 期临床试验-PaCa-DD-041(Eudra-CT 2009-011968-11)。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Jan;197(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01654-4. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Diffusion-weighted MRI and MR- volumetry--in the evaluation of tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像和磁共振容积测量法——用于评估局部晚期直肠癌患者术前放化疗后的肿瘤反应。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;33(2):201-12. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
5
Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and (18) F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade.弥散加权磁共振成像和(18)F-FDG-PET/CT评估胃腺癌化疗疗效:表观扩散系数和部分容积校正标准化摄取值与组织学肿瘤退缩分级的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Nov;40(5):1147-57. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24464. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
6
Combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging as a predictor of histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results in osteosarcoma.18F-FDG PET/CT 与弥散加权磁共振成像联合预测骨肉瘤新辅助化疗的组织学反应:初步结果。
J Nucl Med. 2013 Jul;54(7):1053-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115964. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficients on diffusion-weighted MRI and standardized uptake value on FDG-PET/CT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.胰腺腺癌中扩散加权磁共振成像的表观扩散系数与氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描标准化摄取值之间的相关性
Acta Radiol. 2015 Sep;56(9):1034-41. doi: 10.1177/0284185114549825. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
8
Preliminary comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and PET/CT in predicting histological type and malignancy of lung cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像与正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在预测肺癌组织学类型及恶性程度中的初步比较
Clin Respir J. 2017 Mar;11(2):151-158. doi: 10.1111/crj.12316. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
Response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 18FDG PET/CT.局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗的疗效:采用扩散加权磁共振成像和18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像/X线计算机体层摄影术进行评估
Abdom Imaging. 2012 Dec;37(6):1032-40. doi: 10.1007/s00261-011-9839-1.
10
Values of apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.胰腺癌新辅助治疗患者表观扩散系数的价值。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1160. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12934-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in resectable pancreatic cancer: a new prognostic factor for biologically borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.可切除胰腺癌术前磁共振成像的最小表观扩散系数值:生物学上临界可切除胰腺癌的一个新的预后因素。
Surg Today. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03050-w.
2
Values of apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.胰腺癌新辅助治疗患者表观扩散系数的价值。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1160. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12934-y.
3
Diffusion-weighted imaging for determining response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
扩散加权成像在评估胰腺癌新辅助治疗反应中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):3238-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10381-0. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
4
Surgery for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-is it only about the vessels?局部晚期胰腺导管腺癌的手术治疗——仅仅关乎血管吗?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Oct;12(5):2503-2511. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-313.
5
The Role of Imaging in Current Treatment Strategies for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.影像学在胰腺腺癌现行治疗策略中的作用。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jan;22(1):23-40. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0862. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
6
Surgical indication for and desirable outcomes of conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.初始不可切除的胰腺导管腺癌患者中转手术的手术指征及理想结局
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Oct 29;4(1):6-13. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12295. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
Diffusion-weighted MRI predicts the histologic response for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a prospective study (DIFFERENT trial).扩散加权 MRI 预测新辅助治疗胰腺癌患者的组织学反应:一项前瞻性研究(DIFFERENT 试验)。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Feb;405(1):23-33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01857-4. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Dendritic cell immunotherapy induces anti-tumor effect in a transgenic mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.树突状细胞免疫疗法在胰腺导管腺癌转基因小鼠模型中诱导抗肿瘤作用。
Am J Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 1;9(11):2456-2468. eCollection 2019.