Wardy Wisdom, Chonpracha Pitchayapat, Chokumnoyporn Napapan, Sriwattana Sujinda, Prinyawiwatkul Witoon, Jirangrat Wannita
School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State Univ. Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803-4200, USA.
Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Testing Unit, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai Univ., Chiang Mai, 50100, Thailand.
J Food Sci. 2017 Feb;82(2):500-508. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13610. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
Substantial evidence suggests influence of color, physical state, and other extrinsic features on consumer perception and acceptability of food products. In this study, 560 subjects evaluated liking and emotional responses associated with 5 sweeteners (sucralose, stevia, saccharin, aspartame, and sucrose) under 2 eliciting conditions: control (brand name only) and informed (brand name/packet image), to assess impact of the packet color. For a given condition, 5 identical tea samples each labeled with a sweetener type were rated for sweetness and overall liking (9-point) and emotions (5-point). Nonsignificant interactions between eliciting condition and sweetener type were found for liking attributes and emotions (except peaceful), indicating their independent effects. However, overall differences existed among sweetener types and eliciting conditions based on both hedonic and emotional responses (MANOVA, P < 0.05), suggesting modulating effects of packet color on sweetener type in the sensory-emotion space. The sensory-emotion profile for sucrose was separate from that of nonnutritive sweeteners, with statistically significant Mahalanobis distances among sample centroids. Increases in positive emotion intensities contrasted with a decrease in negative emotion intensities were observed for some sweeteners moving from the control to informed condition. Sweetness liking was strongly correlated with the emotion satisfied (sucralose, saccharin) only in the control condition, whereas it was strongly correlated with the emotions pleased and satisfied (stevia), disgusted (aspartame), and satisfied (sucrose) only in the informed condition. Overall, results suggested that sensory liking and emotions during the consumption experience are related not entirely to the type of sweetener, but also the color of the packet.
大量证据表明,颜色、物理状态和其他外在特征会影响消费者对食品的认知和接受度。在本研究中,560名受试者在两种诱发条件下评估了与5种甜味剂(三氯蔗糖、甜菊糖、糖精、阿斯巴甜和蔗糖)相关的喜好度和情绪反应:对照(仅品牌名称)和告知(品牌名称/包装图片),以评估包装颜色的影响。对于给定条件,对5个分别标有甜味剂类型的相同茶样进行甜度、总体喜好度(9分制)和情绪(5分制)评分。在喜好属性和情绪方面(除了平静),诱发条件和甜味剂类型之间未发现显著的交互作用,表明它们具有独立的影响。然而,基于享乐主义和情绪反应,甜味剂类型和诱发条件之间存在总体差异(多变量方差分析,P < 0.05),这表明包装颜色在感官 - 情绪空间中对甜味剂类型具有调节作用。蔗糖的感官 - 情绪特征与非营养性甜味剂不同,样本质心之间的马氏距离具有统计学意义。从对照条件到告知条件,一些甜味剂的积极情绪强度增加,而消极情绪强度降低。甜度喜好仅在对照条件下与满足情绪(三氯蔗糖、糖精)密切相关,而仅在告知条件下与愉悦和满足情绪(甜菊糖)、厌恶情绪(阿斯巴甜)以及满足情绪(蔗糖)密切相关。总体而言,结果表明消费体验中的感官喜好和情绪不仅与甜味剂类型有关,还与包装颜色有关。