Suppr超能文献

前庭神经鞘瘤手术后的不良事件:手术入路的比较

Adverse Events Following Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: A Comparison of Surgical Approach.

作者信息

Tolisano Anthony M, Littlefield Philip D

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2017 Apr;38(4):551-554. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001323.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Compare complications of vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection by surgical approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

The 2008 to 2013 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with VS resection by an otolaryngologist.

INTERVENTIONS

VS resection via transtemporal (TT), retrosigmoid (RS), or middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation approaches were compared with hearing sacrificing approaches. Demographics and intraoperative factors were analyzed to identify predictors of medical and surgical complications, return to the operating room, and death. The effect of trainee presence was evaluated with respect to complications, operative length, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven VS resections were identified. Patients were predominantly women (57%) and older than 50 years (69%). The TT approach accounted for 50% of the cases, while RS (36%) and MCF (14%) were less common. The risk of any postoperative complication was 17%. There were no patient deaths. There was no difference in the overall complication rate among surgical approaches, nor in the overall, surgical, or medical complication rates between hearing preservation and hearing sacrificing approaches. Trainee presence did not change operation length, hospital length of stay, or complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates of VS resection are no different when comparing TT, RS, or MCF approaches. Trainee involvement did not significantly affect complications. This study is limited by the inability to evaluate procedure-specific variables (e.g., facial nerve weakness and hearing preservation rates), but offers a unique survey of global 30-day complication rates reported to a large, multi-institutional, publically available database.

摘要

目的

比较不同手术入路切除前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)的并发症。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

研究背景

2008年至2013年美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划。

研究对象

由耳鼻喉科医生进行VS切除的成年患者。

干预措施

经颞部(TT)、乙状窦后(RS)或中颅窝(MCF)入路切除VS。

主要观察指标

比较听力保留入路和听力牺牲入路。分析人口统计学和术中因素,以确定医疗和手术并发症、返回手术室及死亡的预测因素。评估实习医生参与对并发症、手术时长和住院时长的影响。

结果

共确定111例VS切除术。患者以女性为主(57%),年龄大于50岁(69%)。TT入路占病例的50%,而RS(36%)和MCF(14%)较少见。术后任何并发症的风险为17%。无患者死亡。手术入路之间的总体并发症发生率无差异,听力保留和听力牺牲入路之间的总体、手术或医疗并发症发生率也无差异。实习医生的参与未改变手术时长、住院时长或并发症发生率。

结论

比较TT、RS或MCF入路时,VS切除的并发症发生率无差异。实习医生的参与未显著影响并发症。本研究的局限性在于无法评估特定手术变量(如面神经麻痹和听力保留率),但提供了对一个大型、多机构、公开可用数据库报告的全球30天并发症发生率的独特调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验