Gimbel Sarah I, Brewer James B, Maril Anat
Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel; Department of Cognitive Sciences, The Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite C212, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite C212, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;1658:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
This study examines how individuals differentiate recent-single-exposure-based familiarity from pre-existing familiarity. If these are two distinct cognitive processes, are they supported by the same neural bases? This study examines how recent-single-exposure-based familiarity and multiple-previous-exposure-based familiarity are supported and represented in the brain using functional MRI. In a novel approach, we first behaviorally show that subjects can divide retrieval of items in pre-existing memory into judgments of recollection and familiarity. Then, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examine the differences in blood oxygen level dependent activity and regional connectivity during judgments of recent-single-exposure-based and pre-existing familiarity. Judgments of these two types of familiarity showed distinct regions of activation in a whole-brain analysis, in medial temporal lobe (MTL) substructures, and in MTL substructure functional-correlations with other brain regions. Specifically, within the MTL, perirhinal cortex showed increased activation during recent-single-exposure-based familiarity while parahippocampal cortex showed increased activation during judgments of pre-existing familiarity. We find that recent-single-exposure-based and pre-existing familiarity are represented as distinct neural processes in the brain; this is supported by differing patterns of brain activation and regional correlations. This spatially distinct regional brain involvement suggests that the two separate experiences of familiarity, recent-exposure-based familiarity and pre-existing familiarity, may be cognitively distinct.
本研究考察了个体如何区分基于近期单次接触的熟悉感与先前已有的熟悉感。如果这是两个不同的认知过程,它们是否由相同的神经基础支持?本研究使用功能磁共振成像,考察了基于近期单次接触的熟悉感和基于先前多次接触的熟悉感在大脑中是如何得到支持和表征的。采用一种新颖的方法,我们首先通过行为学表明,受试者能够将已有记忆中项目的提取分为回忆判断和熟悉感判断。然后,使用功能磁共振成像,我们考察了在基于近期单次接触的熟悉感和已有熟悉感判断过程中,血氧水平依赖活动和区域连通性的差异。在全脑分析、内侧颞叶(MTL)子结构以及MTL子结构与其他脑区的功能相关性方面,这两种熟悉感判断显示出不同的激活区域。具体而言,在MTL内,嗅周皮层在基于近期单次接触的熟悉感过程中激活增加,而海马旁皮层在已有熟悉感判断过程中激活增加。我们发现,基于近期单次接触的熟悉感和已有熟悉感在大脑中表现为不同的神经过程;这得到了不同的脑激活模式和区域相关性的支持。这种在空间上不同的脑区参与表明,两种不同的熟悉感体验,即基于近期接触的熟悉感和已有熟悉感,在认知上可能是不同的。