Baumgartner B R, Nelson R C, Torres W E, Malko J A, Peterson J E, Bernardino M E
Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.
Invest Radiol. 1989 Nov;24(11):884-7.
Inability to demonstrate the renal corticomedullary junction (CMJ) on magnetic resonance (MR) images has been reported in connection with several medical renal diseases. T1-weighted spin echo pulse sequences have been advocated to demonstrate a signal intensity difference between cortex and medulla. This study was undertaken to determine which of several T1-weighted spin echo (SE) and gradient echo (GE) sequences are better for delineation of the CMJ. The MR studies were performed at 0.5 Tesla on 27 normal volunteers. Multi-slice axial images of both kidneys were obtained in all subjects at each of the following five pulse sequences: SE 250/20, SE 500/30, SE 900/30, and GE 300/15 with 80 degrees and 64 degrees flip angles. Contrast/noise ratios were calculated for the signal intensity differences between cortex and medulla; the average standardized contrast/noise ratios ranked as follows: GE 300/15/80 degrees = 3.01 +/- 0.74, GE 300/15/64 degrees = 2.72 +/- 0.74, SE 250/20 = 2.02 +/- 0.33, SE 500/30 = 1.96 +/- 0.51, and SE 900/30 = 1.71 +/- 0.39. In addition, the five sequences for each patient were randomized and the images were independently ranked for delineation of CMJ by three MR radiologists. The cumulative subjective ranking for all observers from best to worst is as follows: SE 500/30, GE 300/15/80 degrees, GE 300/15/64 degrees, SE 900/30, SE 250/20. Although better contrast/noise ratios are achieved with the GE sequences and the more T1-weighted SE sequences, as a practical matter this does not seem to be the only significant factor when compared with the visual image evaluation by independent observers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
磁共振(MR)图像上无法显示肾皮质髓质交界区(CMJ)已被报道与多种肾脏疾病相关。有人主张采用T1加权自旋回波脉冲序列来显示皮质和髓质之间的信号强度差异。本研究旨在确定几种T1加权自旋回波(SE)和梯度回波(GE)序列中哪种更适合描绘CMJ。在0.5特斯拉磁场下对27名正常志愿者进行了MR研究。在以下五种脉冲序列的每一种下,对所有受试者的双肾进行多层轴位成像:SE 250/20、SE 500/30、SE 900/30以及翻转角为80度和64度的GE 300/15。计算皮质和髓质之间信号强度差异的对比噪声比;平均标准化对比噪声比排名如下:GE 300/15/80度 = 3.01 ± 0.74,GE 300/15/64度 = 2.72 ± 0.74,SE 250/20 = 2.02 ± 0.33,SE 500/30 = 1.96 ± 0.51,SE 900/30 = 1.71 ± 0.39。此外,对每位患者的五种序列进行随机排列,由三位MR放射科医生对图像描绘CMJ的情况进行独立排序。所有观察者从最佳到最差的累积主观排名如下:SE 500/30、GE 300/15/80度、GE 300/15/64度、SE 900/30、SE 250/20。虽然GE序列和更多T1加权SE序列能获得更好的对比噪声比,但实际上与独立观察者的视觉图像评估相比,这似乎并不是唯一的重要因素。(摘要截于250字)