• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首发精神病患者接受五年专业化早期干预与两年专业化早期干预后再接受三年标准治疗的对比:丹麦的随机、优效性、平行组试验(OPUS II)

Five years of specialised early intervention versus two years of specialised early intervention followed by three years of standard treatment for patients with a first episode psychosis: randomised, superiority, parallel group trial in Denmark (OPUS II).

作者信息

Albert Nikolai, Melau Marianne, Jensen Heidi, Emborg Charlotte, Jepsen Jens Richardt Mollegaard, Fagerlund Birgitte, Gluud Christian, Mors Ole, Hjorthøj Carsten, Nordentoft Merete

机构信息

Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Research Unit, Hellerup, Denmark

Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Research Unit, Hellerup, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ. 2017 Jan 12;356:i6681. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6681.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.i6681
PMID:28082379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5228538/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of five years of specialised early intervention (SEI) treatment for first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder with the standard two years of SEI plus three years of treatment as usual.

DESIGN

Randomised, superiority, parallel group trial with blinded outcome assessment. Randomisation was centralised and computerised with concealed randomisation sequence carried out at an external site.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from six OPUS teams in Denmark between 2009 and 2012. OPUS teams provide SEI treatment to all patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder in Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

400 participants (51% women) with a mean age of 25.6 (standard deviation 4.3) were randomised to five years of SEI (experimental intervention; n=197) or to two years of SEI plus three years of treatment as usual (control; n=203).

INTERVENTIONS

OPUS treatment consists of three core elements-modified assertive community treatment, family involvement, and social skill training-with a patient-case manager ratio of no more than 12:1. For participants randomised to five years of OPUS treatment, the treatment was largely unchanged. Participants randomised to the control group were mostly referred to community health centres after two years of SEI treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Follow-up assessments were conducted five years after start of OPUS treatment. Primary outcome was negative symptoms measured on the scale for assessment of negative symptoms (avolition-apathy, anhedonia, alogia, and affective blunting). Secondary outcomes were remission of both negative and psychotic symptoms, psychotic symptoms, suicidal ideation, substance abuse, compliance with medical treatment, adherence with treatment, client satisfaction, days in hospital care, and labour market affiliation.

RESULTS

Levels of negative symptoms did not differ between the intervention group and control group (1.72 v 1.81 points; estimated mean difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval -0.33 to 0.13), P=0.39). Participants receiving five years of OPUS treatment were more likely to remain in contact with specialised mental health services (90.4% v 55.6%, P<0.001), had higher client satisfaction (estimated mean difference 2.57 points (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 3.79), P<0.001), and had a stronger working alliance (estimated mean difference 5.56 points (95% confidence interval 2.30 to 8.82), P=0.001) than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial tests SEI treatment for up to five years for patients with first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder; previous trials have found treatment effects for programmes lasting from one to three years. The prolonged SEI treatment had few effects, which could be due to the high level of treatment provided to control participants and the late start of specialised treatment.Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov NCT00914238.

摘要

目的

比较针对首发精神分裂症谱系障碍进行五年的专科早期干预(SEI)治疗与标准的两年SEI加三年常规治疗的效果。

设计

随机、优效性、平行组试验,采用盲法结局评估。随机化在外部站点进行集中式计算机化操作,并采用隐藏随机序列。

设置

2009年至2012年期间,从丹麦的六个OPUS团队招募参与者。OPUS团队为丹麦所有被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍的患者提供SEI治疗。

参与者

400名参与者(51%为女性),平均年龄25.6岁(标准差4.3),被随机分为接受五年SEI治疗(实验性干预;n = 197)或两年SEI加三年常规治疗(对照组;n = 203)。

干预措施

OPUS治疗包括三个核心要素——改良的积极社区治疗、家庭参与和社交技能训练,患者与个案管理员的比例不超过12:1。对于随机接受五年OPUS治疗的参与者,治疗基本保持不变。随机分配到对照组的参与者在接受两年SEI治疗后大多被转介至社区健康中心。

主要结局

在OPUS治疗开始五年后进行随访评估。主要结局是使用阴性症状评估量表(意志缺乏-淡漠、快感缺失、言语贫乏和情感迟钝)测量的阴性症状。次要结局包括阴性和精神病性症状的缓解、精神病性症状、自杀观念、药物滥用、遵医嘱治疗、坚持治疗、患者满意度、住院天数以及劳动力市场参与情况。

结果

干预组和对照组的阴性症状水平无差异(1.72对1.81分;估计平均差异-0.10(95%置信区间-0.33至0.13),P = 0.39)。接受五年OPUS治疗的参与者更有可能继续接受专科心理健康服务(90.4%对55.6%,P < 0.001),患者满意度更高(估计平均差异2.57分(95%置信区间1.36至3.79),P < 0.001),且工作联盟更强(估计平均差异5.56分(95%置信区间2.30至8.82),P = 0.001)。

结论

本试验对首发精神分裂症谱系障碍患者进行长达五年的SEI治疗进行了测试;之前的试验发现持续一至三年的治疗方案具有治疗效果。延长的SEI治疗效果甚微,这可能是由于为对照组参与者提供的治疗水平较高以及专科治疗开始较晚。试验注册Clinicaltrial.gov NCT00914238。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a21/5228538/80bcad32e8ac/albn034989.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a21/5228538/457bdef2a39d/albn034989.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a21/5228538/80bcad32e8ac/albn034989.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a21/5228538/457bdef2a39d/albn034989.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a21/5228538/80bcad32e8ac/albn034989.f2_default.jpg

相似文献

1
Five years of specialised early intervention versus two years of specialised early intervention followed by three years of standard treatment for patients with a first episode psychosis: randomised, superiority, parallel group trial in Denmark (OPUS II).首发精神病患者接受五年专业化早期干预与两年专业化早期干预后再接受三年标准治疗的对比:丹麦的随机、优效性、平行组试验(OPUS II)
BMJ. 2017 Jan 12;356:i6681. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6681.
2
Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis.针对近期发病精神病的专业早期干预团队(延长时间)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 2;11(11):CD013287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013287.pub2.
3
Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis.针对近期发病精神病的专业早期干预团队。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 2;11(11):CD013288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013288.pub2.
4
The effect of five years versus two years of specialised assertive intervention for first episode psychosis - OPUS II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.五年与两年专业强化干预首发精神病的效果 - OPUS II:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Mar 10;12:72. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-72.
5
Clinical Recovery and Long-Term Association of Specialized Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual Among Individuals With First-Episode Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: 20-Year Follow-up of the OPUS Trial.首发精神分裂谱系障碍患者接受专业早期干预服务与常规治疗的临床康复和长期关联:OPUS 试验 20 年随访。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 1;80(4):371-379. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.5164.
6
Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in first-episode psychosis: economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial (the OPUS study).首发精神病的早期干预的成本效益:一项随机对照试验(OPUS 研究)的经济学评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;202(1):35-41. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.112300. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
7
Early intervention for psychosis.精神病的早期干预
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004718.pub2.
8
[Specialised first-episode psychosis services: a systematic review of the literature].[专科首发精神病服务:文献系统综述]
Encephale. 2011 May;37 Suppl 1:S66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
9
From research to practice: how OPUS treatment was accepted and implemented throughout Denmark.从研究到实践:OPUS疗法在丹麦全国是如何被接受和实施的。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;9(2):156-62. doi: 10.1111/eip.12108. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
10
Five-year follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial of intensive early intervention vs standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness: the OPUS trial.对首次发作精神病性疾病患者进行强化早期干预与标准治疗的随机多中心试验的五年随访:OPUS试验
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;65(7):762-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.7.762.

引用本文的文献

1
Rates and Predictors of Disengagement and Strength of Engagement for People With a First Episode of Psychosis Using Early Intervention Services: A Systematic Review of Predictors and Meta-analysis of Disengagement Rates.使用早期干预服务的首次发作精神病患者脱离治疗的发生率、预测因素及参与治疗的强度:预测因素的系统评价和脱离治疗发生率的荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):sgac012. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac012. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Predictors of relapse and engagement in care one year after ending services in an urban safety net coordinated specialty care program for first episode psychosis.首发精神病都市安全网综合专科护理项目结束服务一年后的复发和参与护理的预测因素。
Schizophr Res. 2024 Feb;264:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.12.022. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them.循证临床实践:证据有效性的威胁概述及如何将其降至最低
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jul;32:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 May 6.
2
Early intervention in psychosis: obvious, effective, overdue.精神病的早期干预:显而易见、行之有效且迫在眉睫。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 May;203(5):310-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000284.
3
Ten-Year Outcomes of First-Episode Psychoses in the MRC ÆSOP-10 Study.医学研究委员会成人首发精神病研究(MRC ÆSOP-10)中的首发精神病十年随访结果
Short-term disengagement from early intervention service for first-episode psychosis: findings from the "Parma Early Psychosis" program.首发精神病的早期干预服务短期脱离:来自“帕尔马早期精神病”项目的发现。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;59(7):1201-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02564-3. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Rates and predictors of service disengagement in adolescents with first episode psychosis: results from the 2-year follow-up of the Pr-EP program.首发精神病青少年服务脱离的发生率及预测因素:Pr-EP项目2年随访结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;33(7):2217-2229. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02306-5. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
5
Value of gym-based group exercise versus usual care for young adults receiving antipsychotic medication: study protocol for the multicenter randomized controlled Vega trial.基于健身房的团体运动与常规护理对接受抗精神病药物治疗的年轻成年人的价值:多中心随机对照 Vega 试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05086-z.
6
Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of delay to and length of stay with early intervention for psychosis service: findings from the CRIS-FEP study.社会人口学和临床因素预测精神分裂症早期干预服务的延迟和住院时间:CRIS-FEP 研究结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;59(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02522-z. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Discharge destinations for young people with a first episode of psychosis after attending an early intervention for psychosis service.首次出现精神病发作的年轻人在接受精神病早期干预服务后的出院去向。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;57(10):1359-1366. doi: 10.1177/00048674231172404. Epub 2023 May 10.
8
Clinical Recovery and Long-Term Association of Specialized Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual Among Individuals With First-Episode Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: 20-Year Follow-up of the OPUS Trial.首发精神分裂谱系障碍患者接受专业早期干预服务与常规治疗的临床康复和长期关联:OPUS 试验 20 年随访。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 1;80(4):371-379. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.5164.
9
Neglecting the care of people with schizophrenia: here we go again.忽视对精神分裂症患者的照料:我们又重蹈覆辙了。
Psychol Med. 2023 Feb 20;53(4):1-6. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723000247.
10
A Smartphone App to Promote Patient Activation and Support Shared Decision-making in People With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia in Outpatient Treatment Settings (Momentum Trial): Randomized Controlled Assessor-Blinded Trial.一款用于促进精神分裂症门诊治疗患者积极性和支持共同决策的智能手机应用程序(Momentum 试验):随机对照评估者盲法试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(10):e40292. doi: 10.2196/40292.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 May;203(5):379-86. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000295.
4
A five-year randomized parallel and blinded clinical trial of an extended specialized early intervention vs. regular care in the early phase of psychotic disorders: study protocol.一项针对精神障碍早期阶段的延长型专业早期干预与常规护理的五年随机平行双盲临床试验:研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 14;15:22. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0404-2.
5
Optimal duration of an early intervention programme for first-episode psychosis: randomised controlled trial.首发精神病早期干预项目的最佳持续时间:随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;206(6):492-500. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.150144. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
The FOCUS trial: cognitive remediation plus standard treatment versus standard treatment for patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.FOCUS试验:针对超高风险精神病患者的认知康复加标准治疗与标准治疗对比:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0542-8.
7
Ten-year follow-up of the OPUS specialized early intervention trial for patients with a first episode of psychosis.针对首次发作精神病患者的OPUS专门早期干预试验的十年随访。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 May;41(3):617-26. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu155. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
8
How successful are first episode programs? A review of the evidence for specialized assertive early intervention.首发项目的成效如何?针对专门的积极主动早期干预的证据综述。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 May;27(3):167-72. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000052.
9
Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias.研究结果的盲法解读可以切实有效地减少解读偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.011. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
10
Dose equivalents for second-generation antipsychotics: the minimum effective dose method.第二代抗精神病药物的剂量当量:最小有效剂量法。
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Mar;40(2):314-26. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu001. Epub 2014 Feb 3.