School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.
Trends Biochem Sci. 2017 Feb;42(2):155-167. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
The methods of structural biology, while powerful, are technically complex. Although the Protein Data Bank (PDB) provides a repository that allows anyone to download any structure, many users would not appreciate the caveats that should be considered when examining a structure. Here, we describe several key uncertainties associated with the application of X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, single-particle electron microscopy (SPEM), and small-angle scattering (SAS) to biological macromolecules. The take-home message is that structures are not absolute truths - they are models that fit the experimental data and therefore have uncertainty and subjectivity associated with them. These uncertainties must be appreciated - careful reading of the associated paper, and any validation report provided by the structure database, is highly recommended.
结构生物学的方法虽然强大,但在技术上却很复杂。尽管蛋白质数据库 (PDB) 提供了一个存储库,允许任何人下载任何结构,但许多用户可能不会注意到在检查结构时应该考虑的注意事项。在这里,我们描述了与 X 射线晶体学、NMR 光谱学、单颗粒电子显微镜 (SPEM) 和小角散射 (SAS) 应用于生物大分子相关的几个关键不确定性。关键信息是,结构不是绝对的事实——它们是拟合实验数据的模型,因此存在与之相关的不确定性和主观性。这些不确定性必须得到重视——强烈建议仔细阅读相关论文和结构数据库提供的任何验证报告。