• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大肠杆菌对磷霉素耐药性的分子见解。

Molecular insights into fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Ballestero-Téllez M, Docobo-Pérez F, Portillo-Calderón I, Rodríguez-Martínez J M, Racero L, Ramos-Guelfo M S, Blázquez J, Rodríguez-Baño J, Pascual A

机构信息

Unidad intercentros de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.

Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw573.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkw573
PMID:28093485
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Fosfomycin activity in Escherichia coli depends on several genes of unknown importance for fosfomycin resistance. The objective was to characterize the role of uhpT , glpT , cyaA and ptsI genes in fosfomycin resistance in E. coli.

METHODS

WT E. coli BW25113 and null mutants, Δ uhpT , Δ glpT , Δ cyaA , Δ ptsI , Δ glpT-uhpT , Δ glpT-cyaA , Δ glpT-ptsI , Δ uhpT-cyaA , Δ uhpT-ptsI and Δ ptsI-cyaA , were studied. Susceptibility to fosfomycin was tested using CLSI guidelines. Fosfomycin mutant frequencies were determined at concentrations of 64 and 256 mg/L. Fosfomycin in vitro activity was tested using time-kill assays at concentrations of 64 and 307 mg/L (human C max ).

RESULTS

Fosfomycin MICs were: WT E. coli BW25113 (2 mg/L), Δ glpT (2 mg/L), Δ uhpT (64 mg/L), Δ cyaA (8 mg/L), Δ ptsI (2 mg/L), Δ glpT-uhpT (256 mg/L), Δ glpT-cyaA (8 mg/L), Δ glpT-ptsI (2 mg/L), Δ uhpT-cyaA (512 mg/L), Δ uhpT-ptsI (64 mg/L) and Δ ptsI-cyaA (32 mg/L). In the mutant frequency assays, no mutants were recovered from BW25113. Mutants appeared in Δ glpT , Δ uhpT , Δ cyaA and Δ ptsI at 64 mg/L and in Δ uhpT and Δ cyaA at 256 mg/L. Δ glpT-ptsI , but not Δ glpT-cyaA , Δ uhpT-cyaA or Δ uhpT-ptsI , increased the mutant frequency compared with the highest frequency found in each single mutant. In time-kill assays, all mutants regrew at 64 mg/L. Initial bacterial reductions of 2-4 log 10 cfu/mL were observed for all strains, except for Δ uhpT-ptsI , Δ glpT-uhpT and Δ uhpT-cyaA . Only Δ glpT and Δ ptsI mutants were cleared using 307 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin MIC may not be a good efficacy predictor, as highly resistant mutants may appear, depending on other pre-existing mutations with no impact on MIC.

摘要

目的

磷霉素在大肠杆菌中的活性取决于几个对磷霉素耐药性重要性未知的基因。目的是阐明uhpT、glpT、cyaA和ptsI基因在大肠杆菌对磷霉素耐药性中的作用。

方法

研究了野生型大肠杆菌BW25113及其缺失突变体ΔuhpT、ΔglpT、ΔcyaA、ΔptsI、ΔglpT - uhpT、ΔglpT - cyaA

、ΔglpT - ptsI、ΔuhpT - cyaA、ΔuhpT - ptsI和ΔptsI - cyaA。使用CLSI指南检测对磷霉素的敏感性。在64和256mg/L浓度下测定磷霉素突变频率。使用时间杀菌试验在64和307mg/L(人Cmax)浓度下测试磷霉素的体外活性。

结果

磷霉素的MIC分别为:野生型大肠杆菌BW25113(2mg/L)、ΔglpT(2mg/L)、ΔuhpT(64mg/L)、ΔcyaA(8mg/L)、ΔptsI(2mg/L)、ΔglpT - uhpT(256mg/L)、ΔglpT - cyaA(8mg/L)、ΔglpT - ptsI(2mg/L)、ΔuhpT - cyaA(512mg/L)、ΔuhpT - ptsI(64mg/L)和ΔptsI - cyaA(32mg/L)。在突变频率测定中,未从BW25113中回收突变体。在64mg/L时,ΔglpT、ΔuhpT、ΔcyaA和ΔptsI中出现突变体,在256mg/L时,ΔuhpT和ΔcyaA中出现突变体。与每个单突变体中发现的最高频率相比,ΔglpT - ptsI增加了突变频率,但ΔglpT - cyaA、ΔuhpT - cyaA或ΔuhpT - ptsI没有。在时间杀菌试验中。所有突变体在64mg/L时都重新生长。除了ΔuhpT - ptsI、ΔglpT - uhpT和ΔuhpT - cyaA外,所有菌株的初始细菌减少量为2 - 4 log10 cfu/mL。仅使用307mg/L可清除ΔglpT和ΔptsI突变体。

结论

磷霉素的MIC可能不是一个好的疗效预测指标,因为可能会出现高度耐药的突变体,这取决于其他对MIC无影响的预先存在的突变。

相似文献

1
Molecular insights into fosfomycin resistance in Escherichia coli.大肠杆菌对磷霉素耐药性的分子见解。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw573.
2
Molecular mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.大肠杆菌临床分离株中磷霉素耐药的分子机制。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Apr;35(4):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.011. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
3
CTX-M-15-producing urinary Escherichia coli O25b-ST131-phylogroup B2 has acquired resistance to fosfomycin.产CTX-M-15的泌尿道大肠杆菌O25b-ST131-菌系B2已获得对磷霉素的耐药性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Oct;64(4):712-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp288. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
4
The glycerol-3-phosphate permease GlpT is the only fosfomycin transporter in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.甘油-3-磷酸通透酶GlpT是铜绿假单胞菌中唯一的磷霉素转运蛋白。
J Bacteriol. 2009 Nov;191(22):6968-74. doi: 10.1128/JB.00748-09. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
5
Elevated Expression of GlpT and UhpT via FNR Activation Contributes to Increased Fosfomycin Susceptibility in Escherichia coli under Anaerobic Conditions.通过FNR激活导致GlpT和UhpT的表达升高,这有助于大肠杆菌在厌氧条件下对磷霉素的敏感性增加。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Oct;59(10):6352-60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01176-15. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
Characterization of Fosfomycin Resistant Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolates from Human and Pig in Taiwan.台湾地区人和猪源耐磷霉素产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠杆菌分离株的特性分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 17;10(8):e0135864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135864. eCollection 2015.
7
Frequency and Mechanisms of Spontaneous Fosfomycin Nonsusceptibility Observed upon Disk Diffusion Testing of Escherichia coli.大肠埃希菌纸片扩散试验中观察到的磷霉素自发不敏感的频率和机制。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 26;56(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01368-17. Print 2018 Jan.
8
How is fosfomycin resistance developed in Escherichia coli?大肠杆菌中磷霉素耐药性是如何产生的?
Future Microbiol. 2018 Dec;13:1693-1696. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0294. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Molecular Mechanisms of Fosfomycin Resistance in Clinical Escherichia coli Isolates in Mainland China.中国大陆临床分离大肠埃希菌对磷霉素的药敏性及耐药分子机制
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0135269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135269. eCollection 2015.
10
Inactivation of and Genes Reduces GlpT Expression and Susceptibility to Fosfomycin in .基因失活降低了在 中的表达水平并增加了对磷霉素的敏感性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0506922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05069-22. Epub 2023 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of two-component systems EnvZ/OmpR and BaeS/BaeR in in vitro temocillin resistance in Escherichia coli.肠杆菌属体外替莫西林耐药性中双组分系统 EnvZ/OmpR 和 BaeS/BaeR 的意义。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Mar 1;79(3):641-647. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae021.
2
In-patient evolution of a high-persister strain with reduced in vivo antibiotic susceptibility.高耐株的住院患者病情演变,其体内抗生素敏感性降低。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 16;121(3):e2314514121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2314514121. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
An insight into genes responsible for fosfomycin resistance among uropathogens of asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy: A North Indian study.
孕期无症状菌尿的尿路致病菌中磷霉素耐药相关基因的研究:一项北印度研究
Access Microbiol. 2023 Dec 11;5(12). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000623.v5. eCollection 2023.
4
Fosfomycin Uptake in Is Mediated by the Outer-Membrane Porins OmpF, OmpC, and LamB.磷霉素在[具体生物名称未给出]中的摄取由外膜孔蛋白OmpF、OmpC和LamB介导。
ACS Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 12;10(1):127-137. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00367. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
5
Uropathogenic (UPEC)-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: The Molecular Basis for Challenges to Effective Treatment.尿路致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)相关的尿路感染:有效治疗面临挑战的分子基础
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 28;11(9):2169. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092169.
6
[UhpT mutation along with the presence of genes in the genome probably contributes to inherent fosfomycin resistance of ].超磷酸转运蛋白(UhpT)突变以及基因组中基因的存在可能导致[]对磷霉素具有内在抗性。
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Jul 20;43(7):1110-1115. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.07.07.
7
Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms in : an increasing threat.磷霉素耐药机制:日益严峻的威胁。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jul 4;13:1178547. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1178547. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of Glycerol on Fosfomycin Activity against .甘油对磷霉素抗……活性的影响
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 12;11(11):1612. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111612.
9
Mechanisms of high-level fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus epidemic lineage ST5.金黄色葡萄球菌流行株 ST5 高水平磷霉素耐药机制。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Sep 30;77(10):2816-2826. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac236.
10
Strategies of organic phosphorus recycling by soil bacteria: acquisition, metabolism, and regulation.土壤细菌有机磷循环策略:获取、代谢和调控。
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2022 Feb;14(1):3-24. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.13040. Epub 2022 Jan 10.