Han Yu, Sheng Ke, Su Meilan, Yang Nan, Wan Dong
Department of Neurology.
Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Dec 23;13:41-49. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S123501. eCollection 2017.
Previous studies reported that the mild hypothermia therapy (MHT) could significantly improve the clinical outcomes for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess whether the addition of local MHT (LMHT) could significantly improve the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in treating HICH.
Randomized clinical trials on the combined application of MIS and LMHT (MIS+LMHT) vs MIS alone for treating HICH were searched up to September 2016 in databases. Response rate and mortality rate were the primary outcomes, and the neurologic function and Barthel index were the secondary outcomes. Side effects were also analyzed.
Totally, 28 studies composed of 2,325 patients were included to compare the efficacy of MIS+LMHT to MIS alone. The therapeutic effects of MIS+LMHT were significantly better than MIS alone. The pooled odds ratio of response rate and mortality rate was 2.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]=2.22-3.24) and 0.43 (95% CI=0.32-0.57), respectively. In addition, the MIS+LMHT led to a significantly better improvement in the neurologic function and activities of daily living. The incidence of pneumonia was similar between the two treatment methods.
These results indicated that compared to MIS alone, the MIS+LMHT could be more effective for the acute treatment of patients with HICH. This treatment modality should be further explored and optimized.
既往研究报道,亚低温治疗(MHT)可显著改善高血压性脑出血(HICH)患者的临床结局。因此,本荟萃分析旨在系统评估局部亚低温治疗(LMHT)联合微创外科手术(MIS)治疗HICH能否显著提高疗效。
检索截至2016年9月数据库中关于MIS联合LMHT(MIS+LMHT)与单纯MIS治疗HICH的随机临床试验。主要结局为有效率和死亡率,次要结局为神经功能和巴氏指数。同时分析副作用。
共纳入28项研究,2325例患者,比较MIS+LMHT与单纯MIS的疗效。MIS+LMHT的治疗效果显著优于单纯MIS。有效率和死亡率的合并比值比分别为2.68(95%置信区间[CI]=2.22-3.24)和0.43(95%CI=0.32-0.57)。此外,MIS+LMHT在神经功能和日常生活活动方面的改善明显更好。两种治疗方法的肺炎发生率相似。
这些结果表明,与单纯MIS相比,MIS+LMHT治疗HICH患者急性期可能更有效。这种治疗方式应进一步探索和优化。