Langton David, Sha Joy, Ing Alvin, Fielding David, Wood Erica
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Frankston Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2017 May;47(5):536-541. doi: 10.1111/imj.13372.
Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an approved bronchoscopic intervention for the treatment of severe asthma. However, limited published experience exists outside of clinical trials regarding patient selection and outcomes achieved.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT in patients with severe asthma encountered in clinical practice.
This is a retrospective analysis of the first 'real world' data from Australia. The following outcomes were measured prior to, and 6 months following BT: spirometry, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score, reliever and preventer medication use and exacerbation history.
Twenty patients were treated from June 2014 to December 2015 at three university teaching hospitals. All subjects met the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society definition of severe asthma. Mean pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 62.8 ± 16.6% predicted (range: 33-95%). All patients were being treated with high dose inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists. Ten patients (50%) were taking maintenance oral prednisolone. Most subjects also required at least one of montelukast (65%), omalizumab (30%) and methotrexate (20%). ACQ-5 improved from 3.6 ± 1.1 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.2 at 6 months, P < 0.001. Short-acting reliever use decreased from a median of 8.0-0.25 puffs/day, P < 0.001, and exacerbations requiring corticosteroids also significantly reduced. Five of 10 patients completely discontinued maintenance oral corticosteroids. Ten patients with a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s of <60% predicted significantly improved from 49.2 ± 9.6% to 61.8 ± 17.6%, P < 0.05. Only two procedures required hospitalisation beyond the planned overnight admission.
BT is a safe procedure which can achieve clinical improvement in those with uncontrolled symptoms and severe airflow obstruction.
支气管热成形术(BT)是一种已获批准用于治疗重度哮喘的支气管镜介入治疗方法。然而,关于患者选择和治疗效果,临床试验之外的已发表经验有限。
评估支气管热成形术在临床实践中治疗重度哮喘患者的有效性和安全性。
这是一项对来自澳大利亚的首批“真实世界”数据的回顾性分析。在支气管热成形术前及术后6个月测量以下指标:肺功能、哮喘控制问卷-5(ACQ-5)评分、缓解药物和预防药物的使用情况以及加重病史。
2014年6月至2015年12月期间,在三家大学教学医院对20例患者进行了治疗。所有受试者均符合欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会对重度哮喘的定义。支气管扩张剂使用前1秒用力呼气容积的平均值为预测值的62.8±16.6%(范围:33 - 95%)。所有患者均接受高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素、长效β受体激动剂和长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂治疗。10例患者(50%)正在服用维持剂量的口服泼尼松龙。大多数受试者还至少需要孟鲁司特(65%)、奥马珠单抗(30%)和甲氨蝶呤(20%)中的一种。ACQ-5评分从基线时的3.6±1.1改善至6个月时的1.6±1.2,P<0.001。短效缓解药物的使用从每日中位数8.0喷降至0.25喷,P<0.001,且需要使用糖皮质激素的病情加重情况也显著减少。10例患者中有5例完全停用了维持剂量的口服糖皮质激素。1秒用力呼气容积基线值<预测值60%的10例患者从49.2±9.6%显著改善至61.8±17.6%,P<0.05。只有2例手术需要在计划的过夜住院之外额外住院。
支气管热成形术是一种安全的治疗方法,可使症状未得到控制且存在严重气流受限的患者获得临床改善。