Barker Abigail R, Huntzberry Kelsey, McBride Timothy D, Mueller Keith J
Rural Policy Brief. 2017 Jan 1(2017 2):1-4.
Purpose. From October 2013—before implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)—to November 2016, Medicaid enrollment grew by 27 percent. However, very little attention has been paid to date to how changes in Medicaid enrollment vary within states across the rural-urban continuum. This brief reports and analyzes changes in enrollment in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural (noncore) areas in both expansion states (those that used ACA funding to expand Medicaid coverage) and nonexpansion states (those that did not use ACA funding to expand Medicaid coverage). The findings suggest that growth has been uneven across rural-urban geography, and that Medicaid enrollment growth is lower in rural counties, particularly in nonexpansion states. Key Findings. (1) Medicaid growth rates in metropolitan counties in nonexpansion states from 2012 to 2015 were twice as large as in rural counties (14 percent compared to 7 percent). (2) In contrast, the differential in growth rates between metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural counties was much less dramatic in expansion states (growth rates of 43 percent, 38 percent, and 38 percent, respectively). (3) Analysis at the state level shows much variability across the states, even when controlling for expansion status. For example, some states with an above-average rural population, such as Tennessee and Idaho, had higher-than-average enrollment increases, with strong rural increases, while other states with similar proportions of rural residents, such as Nebraska, Oklahoma, Maine, and Wyoming, experienced enrollment decreases in micropolitan and/or rural counties. (4) States’ pre-ACA Medicaid eligibility levels for parents and children affected the potential for growth. For example, some states that had higher eligibility levels (e.g., Maryland and Illinois) experienced lower Medicaid growth rates from 2012 to 2015, in part because their baseline enrollment was higher. (5) In the expansion states of Colorado and Nevada, which both have State-Based Marketplaces (SBMs), enrollment increases were over four times the overall average.
目的。从2013年10月(《平价医疗法案》(ACA)实施之前)到2016年11月,医疗补助计划的参保人数增长了27%。然而,迄今为止,很少有人关注医疗补助计划参保人数的变化在各州城乡连续区域内是如何不同的。本简报报告并分析了扩大医保覆盖范围的州(即那些利用ACA资金扩大医疗补助计划覆盖范围的州)和未扩大医保覆盖范围的州(即那些未利用ACA资金扩大医疗补助计划覆盖范围的州)中大城市、微型城市和农村(非核心)地区的参保人数变化。研究结果表明,城乡地域的增长并不均衡,农村县的医疗补助计划参保人数增长较低,尤其是在未扩大医保覆盖范围的州。主要发现。(1)2012年至2015年,未扩大医保覆盖范围的州中大城市县的医疗补助计划增长率是农村县的两倍(分别为14%和7%)。(2)相比之下,在扩大医保覆盖范围的州,大城市、微型城市和农村县之间的增长率差异则小得多(分别为43%、38%和38%)。(3)州层面的分析表明,即使控制了医保覆盖范围的扩大情况,各州之间仍存在很大差异。例如,一些农村人口高于平均水平的州,如田纳西州和爱达荷州,参保人数增长高于平均水平,农村地区增长强劲,而其他农村居民比例相似的州,如内布拉斯加州、俄克拉荷马州、缅因州和怀俄明州,微型城市和/或农村县的参保人数却有所下降。(4)各州在ACA实施前对父母和子女的医疗补助资格水平影响了增长潜力。例如,一些资格水平较高的州(如马里兰州和伊利诺伊州)在2012年至2015年期间医疗补助计划增长率较低,部分原因是其基线参保人数较高。(5)在拥有州级医保市场(SBM)的科罗拉多州和内华达州这两个扩大医保覆盖范围的州,参保人数增长超过总体平均水平的四倍。